Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp
So if someone breaks into your house and helps himself to your cash and valuables, and the police know who did it but ignore the crime, you’d be okay with that regardless of the felonious nature of the theft against your person and of your property?
That makes about as much sense as leaving an America-destroying mozlim traitor in the office of our presidency when he is not eligible, nor competent for that matter, to be there, because the screaming leftists who are trying to engineer a communist takeover of the entire world might make a fuss.
That is how they have gotten as far as they have. They engage in hysterical hyperbole, and we give them their way. That has to stop. We are a country of laws, not a country of homosexual, emotional, shrieking men.
Your argument makes not a whit of sense. And your understanding of what “elected” means is outdated at best. The investigations of the last two elections are running apace, and there has been a phenomenal amount of election fraud exposed on the part of the commie democrats.
They had to cheat, so they didn’t win. Chew on all that for a while.
Jesse Jackson Jr was just re-elected prior to signing his plea agreement to go to the slammer wasn’t he? I don’t see anyone rioting in Chicago or DC...
You should be concerned that your POTUS is a felon, and that he is being protected by a corrupt US AG.
Bull, the stewardesses would have whispered behind their curtain, that's it. They certainly wouldn't have denied a seat to a ticketed customer and you don't know if she flew unaccompanied or not. I don't know how much experience you have with mixed race newborns, but they don't always look "mixed" until they are a little older and Ms. Dunham was dark haired, possibly with a good tan and BO is not very dark even as an adult. She and her baby would not have looked mismatched at the time they would have traveled back to WA state in September when the baby was 4-6 weeks in age. It also doesn't matter that her SS number was issued in WA state either, it is where she graduated from high school after all. There is simply no there, there. You are postulating things (like that airlines wouldn't let her fly with a mixed race infant) based on your desire that they be true, not on any fact based knowledge.
Really?
Are you serious?
The Democrats will never turn on obma. The media will never turn on obama. Eternity will have long ran its course before either happens.
Really?
Are you serious?
Those are not actions of violence. They are actions of self responsibility to help ensure survival in case of threatening events (probability increasing).
The records weren’t destroyed “mysteriously”. They simply weren’t kept in perpetuity because they weren’t important to waste time, space and money on.
And I don’t believe the missionary story. Remembering a person they didn’t personally know 45 years later? Not likely and also not proof. Eyewitness identification is notoriously bad. 45 years after the fact is serious bullshit territory.
“Millions upon millions voted for Obama in spite of all the new eligibility “evidence” since 2008, right?”
Let me ask you CitizenUSA. How much of that ‘new eligibility evidence’ did you see the main stream media report on so the masses would be aware of? How many times did you see the MSM dedicate a report on him having a Connecticut SS number when he never lived there? How many times did they dedicate a news report on him having a fraudulent Selective Service Registration pica U.S. Postal date stamp? How many times did you ever hear a reporter ‘directly ask’ Obama why his mother added ‘Soebarkah’ to his name on her passport renewal? And what it meant? And how many times did you ever hear a reporter with the MSM ask Obama ‘directly’ in a press conference why his long form birth certificate has ‘clipping masks’ discovered by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation confirming it is a forgery?
None of that was the case in the Georgia Ballot Eligibility Challenge where Obama or his defense team never showed up to confront the allegations made against them. The Judge ruled in team Obama’s favor after the Connecticut SS evidence was presented as well as experts testifying on the stand to explain Obama’s forged birth certificate.
Better analogy. Breaking into a house is a one time event.
Occupying your (white) house is more like what has happened here.
I think of it more like:
So if someone kidnaps your daughter, and the police know who did it but ignore the crime, you’d be okay with that regardless of the felonious nature of the crime, and the fact that he still has your daughter?
He is still hold a knife to Lady Liberty’s throat, and having his way with her every night.
I find this unacceptable.
This explanation for the SS# is all new to me.
Have to digest that for a while.
Agree, but it depends on the type of seeds. “Hemp?”.
Some never will. The people actively complicit in treason dare not.
As to the media? Cracks are already showing in that façade.
Eternity is a long time, he is filled with great wrath, for he knows he has but a short while.
You’re right, null and void. That is a better analogy. Thank you.
The Constitution comes first.
Party politics and the like come 3rd (after national defense).
Question is, how is someone who is born owing allegiance to a foreign nation considered a "natural born Citizen" of our country and eligible to be our Commander in Chief?
Nearly all of the so called Constitution loving "Conservatives" disregarded that question and in fact, ridiculed those who asked it.
There's simply zero excuse for that.
justiceseeker93: “So it has happened before.”
Yes. Nixon was forced out of office, but I think you’re mistaken if you believe this is a similar situation.
For one thing, Republicans have principles. If Obama was our guy, we’d generally support impeachment if it was proven he’d lied. Democrats, on the other hand, will back their guys in almost all cases. If they’re forced to act, they’ll do the bare minimum to punish a Democrat transgressor and restore him or her as quickly as possible.
Secondly, Republicans don’t normally resort to violence to get their way. President Obama is a member of a minority that frames many issues in racial terms. That minority will likely see any impeachment attempt as a racist attack and will respond with violence. Think large scale riots and potential civil war (assuming impeachment gets past the senate—a highly improbable event).
Thirdly, the media is completely in the tank for Obama. No matter what evidence is found, assuming more damning evidence IS found, the media will frame it in a way to protect Obama. Any benefit of the doubt, no matter how remote, will be given as evidence that President Obama is innocent.
Likely. But he still has 3+ years of potentially shooting himself in the foot. Pray.
In fact, how could he even be considered "de facto?"
"To satisfy the doctrine, the officer must be in the unobstructed possession of the office and discharging its duties in full view of the public, in such manner and under such circumstances as not to present the appearance of being an intruder or usurper."
http://info.libraries.vermont.gov/SUPCT/160/op92-113.txt
Additional information:
De Facto Officer Law & Legal Definition
"The following is case law defining the term De Facto Officer. “An officer de facto is one whose acts, though not those of a lawful officer, the law, upon principles of policy and justice, will hold valid so far as they involve the interests of the public and third persons, where the duties of the office were exercised:
First, without a known appointment or election, but under such circumstances of reputation or acquiescence as were calculated to induce people, without inquiry, to submit to or invoke his action, supposing him to be the officer he assumed to be;
Second, under color of a known and valid appointment or election, but where the officer had failed to conform to some precedent requirement or condition, as to take an oath, give a bond, or the like;
Third, under color of a known election or appointment, void because the officer was not eligible, or because there was a want of power in the electing or appointing body, or by reason of some defect or irregularity in its exercise, such ineligibility, want of power, or defect being unknown to the public;
Fourth, under color of an election or appointment by or pursuant to a public unconstitutional law, before the same is adjudged to be such”. [Jersey City v. Dep't of Civil Serv., 57 N.J. Super. 13, 27 (App. Div. 1959)] "
It was known to the public, by many, prior to him actually usurping the office, that he was not eligible as he is not a "natural born Citizen."
In fact, he informed the world (wide web) that he was born with British citizenship, and thus foreign allegiance owed [inheriting his foreign fathers foreign citizenship by birthright].
His ineligibility was known by the public. Problem is, nobody in a position of power to do anything about it at the time gave a damn. They remain terrified of the issue to this day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.