Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff Joe Now Investigating Obama Alias Harry Bounel: Obama Mama In WA In 1961 (Arpaio)
BirtherReport.com ^ | February 25, 2013 | Al Hendershot

Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp

Today, I had a conversation with an investigator from the Cold Case Posse in AZ. We talked and I expanded on several dossiers filled with evidence for over an hour. They asked for all of my relevant information on Obama, the Harry Bounel alias evidence, and the dossiers I completed on Stanley Ann Dunham, her parents, and Michelle Obama as well. They have it all. BTW they also say that it looks like my information cannot be disproved and will be useful.

I have proof, definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in "1961" as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Heated Discussion; Politics
KEYWORDS: afterbirfturds; arizona; awjeez; awjeeznotthisagain; birftards; birtherbs; birthers; bs; certifigate; conspiracy; doesntiteverstop; harrybounel; hawaii; jihad; joearpaio; kenyanbornmuzzie; kgb; naturalborncitizen; obama; patricelumumbaschool; russia; sheriffjoe; stanleyanndunham; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 861-869 next last
To: CitizenUSA

So if someone breaks into your house and helps himself to your cash and valuables, and the police know who did it but ignore the crime, you’d be okay with that regardless of the felonious nature of the theft against your person and of your property?

That makes about as much sense as leaving an America-destroying mozlim traitor in the office of our presidency when he is not eligible, nor competent for that matter, to be there, because the screaming leftists who are trying to engineer a communist takeover of the entire world might make a fuss.

That is how they have gotten as far as they have. They engage in hysterical hyperbole, and we give them their way. That has to stop. We are a country of laws, not a country of homosexual, emotional, shrieking men.

Your argument makes not a whit of sense. And your understanding of what “elected” means is outdated at best. The investigations of the last two elections are running apace, and there has been a phenomenal amount of election fraud exposed on the part of the commie democrats.

They had to cheat, so they didn’t win. Chew on all that for a while.


101 posted on 02/26/2013 8:04:00 AM PST by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Jesse Jackson Jr was just re-elected prior to signing his plea agreement to go to the slammer wasn’t he? I don’t see anyone rioting in Chicago or DC...


102 posted on 02/26/2013 8:21:50 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great natiorn is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

You should be concerned that your POTUS is a felon, and that he is being protected by a corrupt US AG.


103 posted on 02/26/2013 8:26:31 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great natiorn is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty
something would have been said and done with a young unaccompanied white woman with a mixed race baby

Bull, the stewardesses would have whispered behind their curtain, that's it. They certainly wouldn't have denied a seat to a ticketed customer and you don't know if she flew unaccompanied or not. I don't know how much experience you have with mixed race newborns, but they don't always look "mixed" until they are a little older and Ms. Dunham was dark haired, possibly with a good tan and BO is not very dark even as an adult. She and her baby would not have looked mismatched at the time they would have traveled back to WA state in September when the baby was 4-6 weeks in age. It also doesn't matter that her SS number was issued in WA state either, it is where she graduated from high school after all. There is simply no there, there. You are postulating things (like that airlines wouldn't let her fly with a mixed race infant) based on your desire that they be true, not on any fact based knowledge.

104 posted on 02/26/2013 8:32:32 AM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Really?
Are you serious?


105 posted on 02/26/2013 8:38:10 AM PST by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The Democrats will never turn on obma. The media will never turn on obama. Eternity will have long ran its course before either happens.


106 posted on 02/26/2013 8:38:33 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Really?
Are you serious?


107 posted on 02/26/2013 8:38:41 AM PST by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY

Those are not actions of violence. They are actions of self responsibility to help ensure survival in case of threatening events (probability increasing).


108 posted on 02/26/2013 8:51:32 AM PST by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

The records weren’t destroyed “mysteriously”. They simply weren’t kept in perpetuity because they weren’t important to waste time, space and money on.

And I don’t believe the missionary story. Remembering a person they didn’t personally know 45 years later? Not likely and also not proof. Eyewitness identification is notoriously bad. 45 years after the fact is serious bullshit territory.


109 posted on 02/26/2013 8:54:49 AM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

“Millions upon millions voted for Obama in spite of all the new eligibility “evidence” since 2008, right?”

Let me ask you CitizenUSA. How much of that ‘new eligibility evidence’ did you see the main stream media report on so the masses would be aware of? How many times did you see the MSM dedicate a report on him having a Connecticut SS number when he never lived there? How many times did they dedicate a news report on him having a fraudulent Selective Service Registration pica U.S. Postal date stamp? How many times did you ever hear a reporter ‘directly ask’ Obama why his mother added ‘Soebarkah’ to his name on her passport renewal? And what it meant? And how many times did you ever hear a reporter with the MSM ask Obama ‘directly’ in a press conference why his long form birth certificate has ‘clipping masks’ discovered by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation confirming it is a forgery?


110 posted on 02/26/2013 8:55:40 AM PST by Cold Case Posse Supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

None of that was the case in the Georgia Ballot Eligibility Challenge where Obama or his defense team never showed up to confront the allegations made against them. The Judge ruled in team Obama’s favor after the Connecticut SS evidence was presented as well as experts testifying on the stand to explain Obama’s forged birth certificate.


111 posted on 02/26/2013 8:56:38 AM PST by Cold Case Posse Supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady; CitizenUSA

Better analogy. Breaking into a house is a one time event.

Occupying your (white) house is more like what has happened here.

I think of it more like:

So if someone kidnaps your daughter, and the police know who did it but ignore the crime, you’d be okay with that regardless of the felonious nature of the crime, and the fact that he still has your daughter?

He is still hold a knife to Lady Liberty’s throat, and having his way with her every night.

I find this unacceptable.


112 posted on 02/26/2013 8:58:08 AM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

This explanation for the SS# is all new to me.

Have to digest that for a while.


113 posted on 02/26/2013 8:59:01 AM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Agree, but it depends on the type of seeds. “Hemp?”.


114 posted on 02/26/2013 9:04:03 AM PST by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sport
The Democrats will never turn on obma. The media will never turn on obama. Eternity will have long ran its course before either happens.

Some never will. The people actively complicit in treason dare not.

As to the media? Cracks are already showing in that façade.

Eternity is a long time, he is filled with great wrath, for he knows he has but a short while.

115 posted on 02/26/2013 9:04:54 AM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: null and void; CitizenUSA

You’re right, null and void. That is a better analogy. Thank you.


116 posted on 02/26/2013 9:10:52 AM PST by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA; SeminoleCounty
"I'm willing to keep an open mind on Obama’s eligibility, but I'm also pragmatic. President Obama was elected twice. No one is going to remove a sitting president on his second term. Can you imagine the absolute chaos this would cause? That doesn't make it right, btw, but it's something you should at least consider. Is Obama’s eligibility so important that it's worth tearing the country apart? You might think it's worth it, but most people, even good conservatives, probably wouldn't."

The Constitution comes first.
Party politics and the like come 3rd (after national defense).

Question is, how is someone who is born owing allegiance to a foreign nation considered a "natural born Citizen" of our country and eligible to be our Commander in Chief?

Nearly all of the so called Constitution loving "Conservatives" disregarded that question and in fact, ridiculed those who asked it.

There's simply zero excuse for that.

117 posted on 02/26/2013 9:23:15 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

justiceseeker93: “So it has happened before.”

Yes. Nixon was forced out of office, but I think you’re mistaken if you believe this is a similar situation.

For one thing, Republicans have principles. If Obama was our guy, we’d generally support impeachment if it was proven he’d lied. Democrats, on the other hand, will back their guys in almost all cases. If they’re forced to act, they’ll do the bare minimum to punish a Democrat transgressor and restore him or her as quickly as possible.

Secondly, Republicans don’t normally resort to violence to get their way. President Obama is a member of a minority that frames many issues in racial terms. That minority will likely see any impeachment attempt as a racist attack and will respond with violence. Think large scale riots and potential civil war (assuming impeachment gets past the senate—a highly improbable event).

Thirdly, the media is completely in the tank for Obama. No matter what evidence is found, assuming more damning evidence IS found, the media will frame it in a way to protect Obama. Any benefit of the doubt, no matter how remote, will be given as evidence that President Obama is innocent.


118 posted on 02/26/2013 9:24:24 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Likely. But he still has 3+ years of potentially shooting himself in the foot. Pray.


119 posted on 02/26/2013 9:32:24 AM PST by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: edge919; CitizenUSA
"Impeachment wouldn’t be necessarily since Obama has never been Constitutionally eligible to hold office. He would be considered nothing more than a de facto officer."

In fact, how could he even be considered "de facto?"

"To satisfy the doctrine, the officer must be in the unobstructed possession of the office and discharging its duties in full view of the public, in such manner and under such circumstances as not to present the appearance of being an intruder or usurper."

http://info.libraries.vermont.gov/SUPCT/160/op92-113.txt

Additional information:

De Facto Officer Law & Legal Definition

"The following is case law defining the term De Facto Officer. “An officer de facto is one whose acts, though not those of a lawful officer, the law, upon principles of policy and justice, will hold valid so far as they involve the interests of the public and third persons, where the duties of the office were exercised:

First, without a known appointment or election, but under such circumstances of reputation or acquiescence as were calculated to induce people, without inquiry, to submit to or invoke his action, supposing him to be the officer he assumed to be;

Second, under color of a known and valid appointment or election, but where the officer had failed to conform to some precedent requirement or condition, as to take an oath, give a bond, or the like;

Third, under color of a known election or appointment, void because the officer was not eligible, or because there was a want of power in the electing or appointing body, or by reason of some defect or irregularity in its exercise, such ineligibility, want of power, or defect being unknown to the public;

Fourth, under color of an election or appointment by or pursuant to a public unconstitutional law, before the same is adjudged to be such”. [Jersey City v. Dep't of Civil Serv., 57 N.J. Super. 13, 27 (App. Div. 1959)] "

It was known to the public, by many, prior to him actually usurping the office, that he was not eligible as he is not a "natural born Citizen."

In fact, he informed the world (wide web) that he was born with British citizenship, and thus foreign allegiance owed [inheriting his foreign fathers foreign citizenship by birthright].

His ineligibility was known by the public. Problem is, nobody in a position of power to do anything about it at the time gave a damn. They remain terrified of the issue to this day.

120 posted on 02/26/2013 9:32:53 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 861-869 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson