Only the most shameless Fogblower or fellow traveler would dare to come on FR and hold up Malihi citing “as discussed in Ankeny” (clear meaningless dicta) as being “a trial on the merits” regarding Barry’s NBC status.
For starters, a “trial on the merits” would have included recognition of a plaintiff with standing to challenge Barry’s NBC status (never happened) and full discovery of Barry’s original HI vital records with cross-examination under oath of the custodian of those records.
Citing to an earlier decision on the same issue is not dicta.
Aren’t you perhaps forgetting that Judge Malihi offered the plaintiffs a default judgment against Obama due to Obama’s attorney failing to show up at trial?
It was the plaintiffs, not the judge who rejected a default order and requested a trial on the merits, which the judge granted. “Trial on the merits” was the plaintiffs’ language.
Judge Mahili’s ruling after trial was sent to the Georgia Secretary of State, Brian Kemp who accepted it. Kemp’s acceptance was appealed in Georgia Superior Court. They upheld it. The plaintiffs then appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court. They too refused to overturn Malihi and Kemp. Plaintiff Farrar asked Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to issue a Stay, Justice Thomas denied it. Plaintiff Welden petitioned the US Supreme Court to hear his appeal, the Court denied the petition.
Yup, nothing more meaningless than Ankeny BS and Malihi citing that BS unless your a BOt Flogblower. Not much more meaningless than that.
"Trial on the merits."
LoL. All nonsense mumbo jumbo, and those idiots on Ankeny had the gall to cite (the origin of) an illegal alien lawyer, and then it was regurgitated by a Jimmuuh Carter judge in an immigration case that had nothing to do with being a natural born citizen. BTW, that illegal alien was deported.