Obama Eligibility Appeals Case Winds Up In Alabama Supreme Court With Established Birther Judges

http://www.scribd.com/doc/132864547/SCOAL-2013-03-26-McInnish-Goode-v-Chapman-Brief-of-Appellant ^

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

The case is called McInnish-Goode-v-Chapman. What is interesting about this case is that newly elected Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court is Roy Moore. In the past, he has expressed doubts of where Obama was born. Also interesting is that another Alabama Supreme Court Justice named Tom Parker has gone on record arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” on Obama's 'Short Form' birth certificate and 'Long Form' birth certificate were legitimate cause for concern mainly due to Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County Sheriff Office investigation conclusions. Justice Parker wrote on March 27, 2012:

"Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the "short form" and the "long form" birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public"

Arpaio's investigation results confirming Obama has a forged birth certificate and a forged Selective Service Registration Application has been submitted to the court in a affidavit. Chief Justice Moore is on the record questioning Obama’s eligibility. He defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that President Obama prove his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment orders. Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a natural-born citizen and much evidence that suggests he is not. Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty.” “And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said. Roy Moore is best known for making national headlines when he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.

[MMaschin]

You’re talking about mootness. When Roe v Wade was decided, the baby had already been born.

The court will decide the issue to determine how the SOS should handle situations in the future.

Will the court actually require Obama’s BC? I would doubt it, the SOS could say, if it’s an issue, we will start checking in the future. If the defense say ‘we don’t need to check, the media, and the voters, validate the candidate that might leave an opening to prove them wrong. That’s what I’m hoping for.