Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-professor tells senators climate data manipulated
energycentral ^ | Mar 27, 2013 | Brad Shannon

Posted on 04/03/2013 7:36:55 PM PDT by Rocky

A retired Western Washington University professor testified to a Republican-controlled state Senate committee Tuesday that climate change stopped in 1998 and that human-caused greenhouse gases are not responsible for fluctuations in the Earth's temperatures or melting polar ice caps.

The startling testimony from emeritus professor Don Easterbrook is at odds with an apparent consensus among climate scientists and climate-science literature about human causes behind the the rise in global temperatures over the past century. His testimony came one day after the Legislature sent Gov. Jay Inslee a bill that sets up a legislative work group to study Washington's best strategy for addressing climate change.

(Excerpt) Read more at energycentral.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climatechangefraud; climatetestimony; easterbrook; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Another scientist speaks out, and all the leftists can do is cite "consensus." Sure, that's how we do science.
1 posted on 04/03/2013 7:36:55 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Retired profs have nothing to lose by telling the truth. Not so true of the employed who are pressured to toe the line by their needs for grants.


2 posted on 04/03/2013 7:45:40 PM PDT by BlueYonder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

For later


3 posted on 04/03/2013 7:47:55 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

“Consensus” on “climate change” means they will all agree to continue to seek grants to study (and affirm)”climate change.”


4 posted on 04/03/2013 7:50:33 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueYonder
Retired profs have nothing to lose by telling the truth. Not so true of the employed who are pressured to toe the line by their needs for grants.

I knew a scientist. He didn't retire, but he got fed up and left in disgust and changed industries.

5 posted on 04/03/2013 7:53:41 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

The “settled science” is fake but accurate. I swear it.


6 posted on 04/03/2013 8:07:08 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Watch out, they’ll probably take away his Social Security payments.


7 posted on 04/03/2013 8:13:03 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

tHE SO-CALLED CONSENSUS IS ALSO FAKED DATA.


8 posted on 04/03/2013 8:17:19 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

I love how the democrats kept telling him it is “hotter” even though the data says otherwise.

And as to what Washington State should do about climate change, the obvious answer is ... nothing.


9 posted on 04/03/2013 8:24:03 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky; All

CO2 is the primary source of Carbon for all life on and in the Earth.

Without CO2 life on Earth would be restricted to other, less abundant, sources of Carbon such as CO and CH4.

CO2 in thus an environmentally essential, AND environmentally friendly gas.

CO2 and taxes are similar in that they are good at low concentrations, but toxic at high concentrations.

Global Warming still has no known cause that can be documented by experimental cause and effect experiments.

Consequently, Global Warming remains a speculation in the same realm as the Moon being made of cheese.

IF there are known cause and effect experiments on the change in temperature with a change in CO2 concentration, THEN what peer-reviewed Scientific Journal has published an article on this topic, and what is the title and date of that article?


10 posted on 04/03/2013 8:32:15 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

This is a poorly written article meant to inflame from the very first sentence. Washington State DOES NOT have a Republican Senate majority. All three houses, Governor, House and Senate are all in the Dim majority. What has happened, two fiscally conservative Democrats in the Senate have formed a coalition with the R’s to deal with budget issues.

I quit reading after the first lie by the author in the first sentence. WWU is a far, far left school, it says a lot when one of its comrades, I mean faculty, speaks the truth about the fraud in the science community concerning supposed anthropogenic climate change.


11 posted on 04/03/2013 8:32:15 PM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
Another scientist speaks out, and all the leftists can do is cite "consensus." Sure, that's how we do science.

Yeah, "consensus" used to be that the Earth was flat and the center of the universe... Climate consensus makes about as much sense.

12 posted on 04/03/2013 8:37:27 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
Don Easterbrook is at odds with an apparent consensus among climate scientists and climate-science literature about human causes behind the the rise in global temperatures...insidious tactic #563 - "apparent concensus" - keep slipping it into the conversation enough times without anybody refuting it and soon people start to accept it - when less than half the established scientists in a field believe something, there ain't no concensus....
13 posted on 04/03/2013 8:46:31 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
"The startling testimony..."

Much bias there, Brad Shannon? Certainly not startling to anybody who pays attention to the AGW hoax and scare-mongering.

14 posted on 04/03/2013 8:51:48 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
CH4.

I make that here. I use intestinal bacteria to convert trisaccharides into that.

It's all natural and completely organic.

How about some more beans Mr Taggart?

/johnny

15 posted on 04/03/2013 8:54:35 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

I spent 25 years of my career in electric power. When utility marketing programs became nothing but efforts to convince customers to use less of their product, when they stopped building new conventional plants, when they capitulated to the extreme radical environmentalists instead of fighting them, and when people like John Bryson were made Chairman, CEO and President of Edison International, I knew it was time for me to leave the industry. I, too, left in disgust.


16 posted on 04/03/2013 8:56:50 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

My ex-wife. an MIT grad and expert in environmental computer modeling, recently joined other skeptical scientists in signing a statement saying there is no conclusive proof for man-made global warming. She’s also a super lib, but is a scientist first.


17 posted on 04/03/2013 9:03:27 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

For anyone interested in the other side of the story:

http://www.petitionproject.org/


18 posted on 04/03/2013 9:06:52 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

CH4 is also an inorganic gas from the Earth, no beans about it!


19 posted on 04/03/2013 9:09:33 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
I thought anything with Carbon in it was organic. What do I know... I'm just a cook that barely scratched at organic chemistry.

/johnny

20 posted on 04/03/2013 9:14:29 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson