Skip to comments.The deafening silence of the Holocaust-Shoah establishment
Posted on 04/06/2013 7:18:11 PM PDT by Chuckmorse
At the time of the Feb. 2013 release of my book On the Jewish Question Karl Marx, anti-Semitism and the war against the West, I notified hundreds of museums, institutions, periodicals, and university departments specializing in the Holocaust and in Holocaust and Genocide Studies asking them to please consider including the topics I covered in my book in their discourse. I notified Jewish organizations across the United States and the world. Other than one or two neutral acknowledgements and a couple of nasty emails the silence was deafening.
My book is about the one aspect of the rise of Nazism and the implementation of the Holocaust against the Jews of Europe that is virtually never discussed. Indeed, this one aspect, one out of many that exist in a vast and complex subject, has been virtually airbrushed out of the public discourse. My book has been censored from the otherwise excellent and probative body of analysis and thinking on the topic. I contend that there will never be an integrated understanding of the Holocaust until the subject I raise is broached. The blackout of information I have researched is a crime against the memory of the six million victims of the Holocaust whose blood cries out from the grave for the truth and for justice. It is also an abrogation of responsibility regarding adherence to the spirit of the slogan never again.
The politically incorrect and still sensitive aspect that I raise is the influence that Karl Marx, as evidenced by his anti-Jewish tract On the Jewish Question, first published in 1844 and re-published numerous times and in many languages, had on Nazism and on Hitler. In my book I re-publish Marx treatise, a tract which should be listed in the same infamous pantheon of anti-Semitic hate literature as Mein Kampf and as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, in its entirety with commentary. I link that hateful treatise to the political and philosophical aspirations and the political formation and nature of Nazism. Marx ideas, as I demonstrate, were completely absorbed by Hitler and by the Nazis and Marx ideas, and strategies, had a great deal to do with the Holocaust.
In On the Jewish Question, Karl Marx wrote the following:
What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.
Marx theorized that the best means of eliminating from human society those natural human traits, self-interest, Huckstering, Money, was for Judaism to be made impossible to use his term. Philosophically, Marx claimed that human nature could be changed by eliminating what he viewed as bad influences. Marx wrote about false consciousness which he applied to Judaism, false consciousness that he claimed was created by exploiters. He believed that such false consciousness could be replaced by a new paradigm that would advance human society toward utopia.
He sought to replace such positive human traits as self-interest, which is the natural desire of the human being to define his own life and destiny with collectivism. He sought to replace Huckstering, which is the natural need for the human being to trade goods and services in an atmosphere of freedom with utopia. He sought to replace Money, which allows people a means to store value and which is the basis of private property with Communism. I examine the similarities between this and the Nazi concept of the Ubbermench.
I have been fascinated by the Holocaust since as a child I heard my grandparents and uncles and aunts discuss the topic and the people who were murdered. I wondered how it could have happened. I have searched for an answer ever since. In my quest I try to leave no stone unturned as such a terrible crime deserves a complete and dispassionate understanding. My intention is not to hurt anyones feelings, only to get closer to the truth. At this point in history, after subsequent genocides which took place after World War II and with the genocidal forces that the State of Israel faces, I would hope that others would be courageous enough to join me in my quest.
If you had a crazy uncle who was responsible for the murder of around 200 million people during the 20th century would YOU want to acknowledge him in any way???
Deep down inside, maybe Hitler loved communists. Deep down inside, maybe Hitler loved Jews.
But, his hatred of communists and Jews sure seemed to be sincere. ;-)
Nazis hated Communists for the same reason that the Bloods hate the Crips.
Yes, the Communist Jews were secularized, no question. But they were also Internationalists, rootless and in many cases hateful of the tradition, of the religion, of the patriots, whom they murdered, as in Poland, where after the war (according to your link) 37% of the security apparatus were people of Jewish descent (where in the society as a whole the surviving Jews were then perhaps 1%.) After the war? Wait, where did they come from, weren’t they all murdered by those mythical Nazis? They came to Poland from Russia, and some didn’t even speak Polish.
And yet it was Gomulka and his fellow Polish Commie stooges that had most of the remaining Polish Jews kicked out of the country in 1968.
Polish Jew, and according to your sarcasms, Polish patriot Jakub Berman, mass murderer.
Yep, Berman was a real work of art, wasn’t he?
I don’t want to go there any more, because the ugly truth of those years is politically incorrect to all sides. Most prefer to believe convenient Hollywood lies.
Stalin hated Jews too, but they were useful idiots to him.
Gomulka, from what I’ve read about 1968, was responding to his Party’s base, the proletariat, the anti-semitic lumps, and while he expelled some of the worst (like those from the security and propaganda apparatus), he also expelled some of the best, patriots, and ordinary people.
For a Berman “repair the world” apologist, you’re a weak one with your Christian strawmen that have nothing to do with this thread.
Huh? Stalin was an atheist, who started in the seminary but quickly rejected it.
As was Berman, I might add.
Your Communists were “repairing the world”, that was their motivation, and appears to be the motivation of that mayor of Chicago and his Obamacare designing doctor brother. Tradition, as Fiddler on the Roof taught us! (Third rail to mention it, isn’t it?)