“If you are aware of a convincing demonstration that does accomplish principally the same layering scheme, then please share the details.”
Not a demonstation but a statement by one of the developers of the Mixed Raster Content (MRC) compression standard after he reviewed the whitehouse pdf,
“I took a birth certificate which has a similar background pattern, scanned and compressed using an older DjVu tool. It has shown the same problems as POBC, like text letters that were missed and sent to background, and multiple text styles. It didn’t have halo, though, because its algorithm decided to obliterate the whole background pattern. Perhaps if I had time to toy around with packages and parameters I might find something very close to what was used to generate the document shown by the WH, but I unfortunately do not have the time right now.”
“In summary I can only say I see much stronger signs of common MRC algorithmic processing of the image rather than some intentional manipulation.”
Sincerely
Ricardo L. de Queiroz”
“As to your questions about the date anomaly on the SSS card”
The timeline for information release was like this:
February, 2008 - Selective Service reports that Obama’s SS registration is in order.
August, 2008 - Selective Service in an e-mail to PJMedia says there is nothing out of the ordinary about Obama’s SS registration.
October, 2008 - Selective Service releases copy of Obama’s SSR card.
The Selective Service in a 2012 letter to Mike Zullo, explained the process for SSR cards. The information is transcribed into the computer system, two microfilm copies of the card are made and the original paper card is destroyed. The two microfilm copies are kept in separate Federal Data Centers. One copy is kept as the record copy and the second is used as a working copy.
So for this to be a forgery, someone would have to break-in to at least one of the data centers and replace the existing microfilm roll with a replacement roll that contains the forged SSR card, or at the very least splice the forged image of the SSR card onto the existing roll. And do that before October, 2008.
There would be no need to actually create a paper copy of the SSR card, but instead just create a image that coud be put onto microfilm.
“a date was relayed that wouldn’t have coincided sufficiently to put Obama in the right place at the right time at the right age.”
The law for that time reads - “1-103. Persons born in calendar year 1961 shall present themselves for registration on any of the six days beginning Monday, July 28, 1980.”
Obama was in Los Angeles from September, 1979 to at least June, 1980 and again from September, 1980 to June, 1981 (Occidental College years). Could he have been in Hawaii in July, 1980?
Now, 4zoltan, the shred of hope I had that you would try to maintain the appearance of intellectual integrity is fading. In the last few posts, you’ve raised several points and questions. In my opinion, the responses that a person from my perspective would offer to most of them will be immediately evident to most any discerning observers who might be tuning in to this discussion.
I’ll take the time for one quick example, but then I must get back to my day job.
Has Mike Zullo been granted access to the SSS microfilm record or national archive microfilm records, or is anyone contending that Zullo has been granted or could be granted that access at this point? Remember that I did mention the SSS changed its own rules; to be more specific, they did so such that going forward only federal law enforcement entities (i.e. entities that are generally under the direct authority of the executive branch—not unlike the SSS itself) would be assured access to microfilm or other evidentiary document sources.
Are you really telling me that I can only believe tampering would have occurred if I also concede that someone spliced an archival microfilm role?!
I certainly can’t rule out that, if not by now then perhaps eventually, someone may have had to go so far as to tamper with the film, but my hypothesis is clearly, obviously in no way dependent upon anyone having to do that up to this point. Am I just not understanding your “someone would have had to splice microfilm for that to happen” argument? Or did you just really not understand why MCSO would have sent letters asking to inspect whatever the SSS is keeping in their files? Or are you just having a bad day? Or could it be that your main goal is simply to blow some fog into the discussion in the hopes that it will confuse and dissuade those who aren’t paying close enough attention to the details.
Remember, it was the noticeable presence of intellectually dishonest, half-truth telling “debunkers” on these boards that really started to spark my interest in the Obama eligibility/identity fraud questions.
Alas, I realize for the sake of time, I won’t be able to keep up with you and you’ll think yourself a winner by virtue of having the greater endurance and keeping your questions coming faster than I was able to answer them, but I will cling to some optimism that many of the people reading these boards are more discerning than you give them credit for being. They will see right through your line of reasoning.