This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 06/14/2013 7:02:26 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 06/09/2013 9:33:02 AM PDT by whitedog57
I attended a conference in New York City on Thursday regarding the future of housing finance. While all the proposals were interesting, I asked if this will mutate into another Obamacare debacle at 13,000 pages or the 1,000 page plus immigration bill. And I warned that government policies will assert themselves to control and manipulate whatever is decided, regardless of how ironclad one thinks it will be.
As an example, I mention the recent story where millionaires wanting to buy a home on Marthas Vineyard are eligible for a zero percentage down payment mortgage from the USDA!
The US Department of Agriculture has designated the entire island is as a rural area eligible for a USDA loan.
When I think of a rural area, I think of farms, mountains, etc.
Marthas Vineyard is a rural area? Vacation area for Wall Street, celebrities and politicians (like the Obamas) perhaps. Indeed, Spike Lee, David Letterman, Carly Simon, James Taylor and Mike Nichols and Diane Sawyer are among the high-profile property owners on the island. Another regular is Larry David. The Marthas Vineyard Commission estimates that the peak summer day population of 75,000 includes 15,000 year-round residents (20%). Of course, one of the costs of living on Marthas Vineyard is the possibility of having to hear James Taylor warbling endlessly.
Has the USDA gone wild? the recent Farm Bill of $955 Billion was revealed to be 80% for funding of food stamps.
This is why I am not confident of a solution to the government-backed housing finance system. There is always someone saying But shouldnt lower and middle income families have the opportunity to buy a home on EXPENSIVE vacation spots like Marthas Vineyard? You mean, renting isnt good enough?
That is the flaw in government mortgage programs. Government could insure prime mortgages (10% or more down, credit scores of 660 and above, etc) and have everyone else rent. But the affordable housing advocates want taxpayers to subsidize risky lending.
Marthas Vineyard and affordable housing? Oh please.
Just trying to re-inflate the bubble.
Someone I know just got a USDA loan,single mom,2 kids,living in a Section 8 apartment.
She works hard,she now is the proud owner of a 2 bedroom home in a nice neighborhood,interest rate of 3.5% on a 30 year mortgage,she did good,wanted to get away from the government cheese.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.