Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Nanny State On Steroids
Political Realities ^ | 06/20/13 | Charles M. Phipps

Posted on 06/20/2013 2:48:05 AM PDT by LD Jackson

Nanny StateAs bad as government intrusion is into families here in the United States, it could be a lot worse. A law introduced to the Scottish Parliament would mandate a "named person" (guardian) be appointed for every child in Scotland from birth. Said named person would "promote, support or safeguard the well-being of the child or young person." Children's Minister Aileen Campbell said the responsibility for providing a named person will belong to health boards until the age of five, when it would be transferred to councils.

Under this proposed law, detailed personal information about every child - even down to the names of their pets - would be collected and stored in a government database. A government document seen by the Scottish Daily and Sunday Express newspaper stated the named person would have the legal right to ensure children are raised in a government-approved manner. It further states, "From the time that the child is a baby the family and the community should come together in oneness to raise the child so that the child can grow up to be a pillar of society. In so doing everyone benefits and the community is strengthened."

Whether or not the bill is passed into law remains to be seen. There has been an outcry of protest from parents in Scotland about this proposal.

Just next door in Ireland, a measure has passed which gives the government virtually unchecked authority over the nation's children. Among other things the measure allows:

Back here in the western hemisphere the congress in Venezuela is discussing legislation that would ban the use of baby bottles as part of a push to promote breast-feeding. "Every baby has the right to breast-feeding," said Odalis Monzon, a lawmaker from the ruling United Socialist Party.

All of these proposals and enacted laws reek of communistic ideals. When the government takes this much control over your children and how you raise them, they are no longer your children. They are the government's children who just happen to live in your home.

Could these same things happen here in the United States? Of course they can! The government has already intruded into families and seized control over a lot of things that should be completely controlled by parents. The indoctrination children receive at public schools is the biggest intrusion. Liberal views on homosexuality, sex, abortion, evolution, environment, economics, etc are all pushed on children in schools. And if the lunch you send with your child isn't deemed to be nutritious, it can be seized and replaced with a school cafeteria meal.

Access to the morning after pill, birth control, abortion, etc are all things the government has decreed your child does have access to without your knowledge or permission. You, are the parents, have nothing to say about it.

There are many other ways the government intrudes into families and I have no doubt there are those in our government who would make the intrusion equal, if not exceed, the level of intrusion in Scotland, Ireland and Venezuela. With the creeping intrusion our government already does, one day they may get their chance.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: federalgovernment; nannystate

1 posted on 06/20/2013 2:48:05 AM PDT by LD Jackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

this reality is getting dangerously close to my fiction.


2 posted on 06/20/2013 4:04:56 AM PDT by schm0e ("we are in the midst of a coup.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

Just what everybody needs — a guardian angel on the government payroll.


3 posted on 06/20/2013 4:34:39 AM PDT by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

Many here love the idea of government doing their job for them as parents - regardless of the consequences.

4 posted on 06/20/2013 5:07:40 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson
Said named person would "promote, support or safeguard the well-being of the child or young person."

Kind of like a government-sanctioned godparent.

5 posted on 06/20/2013 6:16:48 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson