HuH? Virtually every point in that letter SUPPORTS Sen. Cruz’s position because an unbord child is undoubtably a person. The fact they can feel pain just proves that.
No. He supports “fetal pain” laws, which are immoral and unconstitutional.
Eternal Vigilence is on a crusade to attack all the prolifers.
The legalization of abortion in the US was only as a safety valve for extreme conditions, not a convenience for narcissistic parents or an instrument of government policy for control of certain populations. It has been used to “adjust” the ratios of various ethnic groups or to support a political point of view, the “adjustments” having little to do with actual practice of liberty or pursuit of happiness.
You're missing the point. The point is....that this bill, by the very nature of it specifying WHEN (how old the fetus is) that you CANNOT have an abortion, it also implies WHEN you CAN have an abortion. I understand the purpose of the bill is to 'restrict' abortions, but by 'legislating' the WHEN ... you are affirming and legalizing the process prior to the WHEN.
You may not be familiar to the OP's history. Anyone who proposed an incremental change to abortion laws is some hideous monster because they do not join in the crusade to immediately make all abortions illegal.
As in, saving some lives is "immoral" since not all will be saved.
Many of us have the long-term identical objectives as the OP, but because we disagree with the path to achieve those objectives, we're apparently bad people.