Posted on 07/21/2013 7:10:18 PM PDT by markomalley
Judging by the faces of self hating Whites I see in pictures of lynch Zimmerman rallies they should be up 100%.
Stay safe, stay armed......
These aren’t “gangs”. These are Obama’s personal soldiers.
Headline: DOG BITES MAN!!
no figures for attacks on white hispanics?
Everything is going according to plan.
The Zimbabwe plan.
I live in Jax...this was a drug deal/ rip-off gone bad. I have no doubt there are other more accurate examples but thi is not one of them...
Putting my obama/government accounting hat on......
“Under Republican policies its projected that gang membership would have increased 80%, resulting in a net reduction of 400,000 gang members saved or avoided’
We have a black problem in America, and no one in government has the spine to admit it, much less find a way to deal with it. Obama has empowered the psychopaths.
This is a Black Rage Ping List, (by request,) to cover the aftermath of the GZ trial and archive the incidents. Let me know. And please add "blackrage" to the keywords. Click the link for anything you might have missed. Thank you.
But because the media and the race-baiters and Obama made a huge issue out of the Zimmerman case, most of the public probably think the exact OPPOSITE of the facts, i.e., that there’s a massive increase of whites attacking/shooting blacks for no reason.
Agreed - although this is technically a black-on-white crime, these victims should not be the poster boys for our argument.
Start of his “Civilian Defense Force”?
They can go to social justice preaching churches all they want, but they are far from Christians. They are a part of a failed sub-culture.
No one has the guts to say that on a national stage, but we know it is true.
Gang membership up 40%. The La Raza “navigators” are going to need a whole truckload of those gang member waiver forms to get all of these maggots on the Freeway to the BIG Pinata.
They feel safe with Obama and Eric Holder leading the Justice Department—and they are right.
Another thing I find misleading about this article is the statistic that “Violent Attacks on Whites Increased %18”. It implies that these violent attacks against white people are being committed by black people. Sure, some of them are, but my understanding is that most violent crimes against blacks are committed by blacks, and most violent crimes against whites are committed by whites.
So, yes, violent attacks on white people probably have increased by 18%. But, historically those attacks are mostly committed by whites. As for what percentage increase there is of violent attacks against white people being committed by black people, the article doesn’t say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.