Xerox 7655 Overview Picture (Obot claims to replicate Obama LFBC pdf w/floating signature)

Native and Natural Born Citizenship Explored ^ | August 6, 2013 | NBC

[4Zoltan]

From Carl Gallups latest interview:

@24:30

“There is great forensic speculation even by Reed Hayes that the wrong document was put up by on White House. In other words it’s a.. it’s a… it is a legal speculation, it’s a forensic speculation, that perhaps the document that we have in our hands was hastily posted and that was the working document and not the one that they meant to release.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-gtBNTtGaY

Makes mee wonder if Hayes is looking at the layers and computer stuff.

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

“Makes mee wonder if Hayes is looking at the layers and computer stuff.”

Elaborate!

[Seizethecarp]

(H/T NBC)

On Wed. 8/21 Carl Gallups was on the blog radio program “Where’s Obama’s Birth Certificate” with guest Miki Booth and Fogblower “Reality Check” (RC) called in @ 37:55

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wheresobamasbirthcertificate/2013/08/21/more-with-miki-booth-and-another-great-patroit-dave-small

Reality Check began telling Carl how the WH pdf was made from a hard copy on a Xerox WorkCentre, but the host thought it was John Woodson and cut him off.

Gallups said he knew who Reality Check was and exactly what he was talking about. Gallups, again, said that Zullo’s team had “no concern” about the Xerox WorkCenter claim and that Zullo knew “all about that” and was “way down the road past that” and that this was Obot “disinformation.”

Gallups said that Zullo had no intention of directly addressing the Obot claims as that would enable further disinformation efforts.

Of special interest, right after Carl got cut off, the host, Michael, said that one of his collaborators had just attended a Ted Cruz presentation and succeeded in passing a “Sheriff’s package” (Arpaio/Zullo video presentations and AL court affidavit, IIRC) to BOTH Ted Cruz’s dad, Raphael and to Jim DeMint, and that they both seemed glad to receive the package.

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

I actually listened to the show. The other caller that called in after RC was done was Foggy himself.

[Red Steel]

I actually listened to the show. The other caller that called in after RC was done was Foggy himself.

FogBlowers here FogBlowers there ...spreading their stinking manure far and wide.

[Seizethecarp]

In the interview Wed 8/21 Carl Gallups also said that he has researched the identity of Fogblower Obot “Reality Check” and believes he is Professor Richard Rockwell, a sociology professor at U. Conn. Some voice in the background on the radio broadcast said no, maybe a caller, but Gallups seemed fairly confident that this is the guy:

http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Richard-Rockwell/13493842

If true, Rockwell is at the executive director of a public opinion research firm, “Roper Center”

Helping Obots to attempt manage public opinion regarding Barry’s eligibility could be a sideline of his...

BTW, when Gallups says that NBC’s findings regarding Xerox WorkCentre copying are “of no concern” to the CCP and the CCP “has moved beyond that,” I take that to mean that they had already found some of the same things that NBC has published, but that substantial additional evidence unrelated to mechanical reproduction of a copy has proved that the WH LFBC pdf image is STILL a forgery!

I suspect CCP has determined it is a forgery not because of the layers and duplicate letters, but because of information on the BC that they are confident they have proved to be false...especially the Kapiolani Hospital being claimed as the birth location. Gallups keeps going back to that like the cat that ate the canary. He sounds like he knows something!

The radio show host confirms that he, too, was made privy to some of Zullo’s additional criminal investigation results that he helped present to his congressman and he surprised by the still undisclosed information that CCP has found.

At the end of the radio interview Gallups says something like “These Obots are in for a horrific surprise. Obots better fasten their seatbelts because there’s a rough ride ahead. It’s going to get very hot for them!”

Of course, Obots remain unimpressed and are complaining, as Gallups says, that Zullo isn’t telling them what he has as can be seen in the comments section of blogger NBC’s post on this radio program:

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/08/22/birthers-afraid-of-the-facts/

[bluecat6]

Reverse engineering to ‘prove how they did it’ or try to disprove repeatability is really a rathole with no win at the end.

Some DOES know how it was made. And it turns into a game of CLUE every time someone guesses or predicts what was done.

The odds of being corrected are very, very slim and there is no real way to prove anything.

Someone did this for the COLB and posted a lot of youtubes and they may be correct. But then the ‘how’ took over for the ‘what’. And what was clear was material red flags in the finished product that by themselves discount the authenticity of the forged COLB. HOW the entire document was made did not, and still does not, really matter.

As many point out here. There are many, many red flags with the LFBC file. Its not just the mechanics. Its the content, its the format. It is so bad it seems that it was an act of brazen arrogance as much as fraud.

[BigGuy22]

“Carl Gallups also said that he has researched the identity of Fogblower Obot “Reality Check” and believes he is Professor Richard Rockwell, a sociology professor at U. Conn.”
__

Reality Check is not Richard Rockwell, and Gallups does himself no favor by giving his opponents another example of just how shoddy his research can be.

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

“Reality Check is not Richard Rockwell”

How do you know?

[4Zoltan]

“These Obots are in for a horrific surprise. Obots better fasten their seatbelts because there’s a rough ride ahead. It’s going to get very hot for them!””

Remember this from July, 2012:

“Folks, hang on this is going to be a hot, hot summer”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uT_PV-Ptjag

More Gallups hyperbole?

[Seizethecarp]

“Folks, hang on this is going to be a hot, hot summer”

In 2012, the Media made sure that it was Romney who was burned at the stake, NOT Barry!

IMO, only when Barry’s own party turns decisively against him (stock market collapse or foreign policy disaster or both) will things move against Barry.

By October 15, Barry will be the most hated president in US history, IMO, as the Obamacare fiasco explodes!

[Seizethecarp]

“Reality Check is not Richard Rockwell, and Gallups does himself no favor by giving his opponents another example of just how shoddy his research can be.”

Is that you, Richard?

[4Zoltan]

"Reverse engineering to ‘prove how they did it’ or try to disprove repeatability is really a rathole with no win at the end."

Here's is what NBC's tests would take away from the CCP:

moveable layers (especially registrar stamp)

scaled layers

rotated layers

one 8-bit layer and multiple 1-bit layers

pixel to pixel identical elements

anti aliasing

x-ray effect

halos

clipping mask hiding information

Basically anything in the CCP's computer experts reports. NBC's tests would show that just putting a document in a scanner could create the artifacts that the CCP experts said were impossible for a scanner to create.

And what does that leave?

fonts

tab settings

"African"

Hawaii statutes that hand out BCs to anyone

no commemorative plaque at hospital

Reed Hayes report

Reed Hayes' report may or may not be significant depending on what he based his findings. Zullo said the CCP sent Hayes all their reports for him to review and come to his own conclusions. If that's true then they probably ruined him as a witness. It is like showing a crime victim mug shots of a suspect and later asking them to pick the culprit out of a line up.

BTW check out the Nordyke BCs. Notice anything about the girl's names in the first line:

Did someone put their forms in the typewriter crooked? And then straighten them out? Is it possible the forms were pre-typed with the known information and then re-typed again after the birth information was known?

[BigGuy22]

“How do you know?”
__

I’m not going to reveal any personal information about either of them, but RC is on record saying that he is not Richard. I believe that any reasonable effort at researching the question would come to the same conclusion. Gallups appears to have made a wild guess.

“Is that you, Richard?”

No.

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

“but RC is on record saying that he is not Richard.”

And how trustworthy is RC?

[BigGuy22]

“And how trustworthy is RC?”
__

You seem to be missing my point.

I’m not trying to convince you of anything — if you wish to believe RC is Richard Rockwell, be my guest.

I am simply pointing out that since RC is not Richard Rockwell, in the long run it is a losing game for you to claim he is. If you don’t believe me, run with the false story. It makes no difference to me.

[Seizethecarp]

Is that you, RC?

[BigGuy22]

“Is that you, RC?”
__

LOL! No, it is not.

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

“believe that any reasonable effort at researching the question would come to the same conclusion”

What reasonable research have you put forth to come to conclusions RC is not Richard?

[BigGuy22]

“What reasonable research have you put forth to come to conclusions RC is not Richard?”
__

I’ve said all I’m going to say on the subject. I’ve given you information which you are free to take or leave. It makes no difference to me what you choose to do with it.