Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
You should be a holder of real property to vote.

The first time I heard that, it took me less than a minute to think of two ways it could be abused to the detriment of the Republic; one way leads to a landed elite making all the decisions (AKA feudalism), and the other to a dilution of the vote as bad as, possibly worse than, the way it is today.

No, thanks. BTW, I am a "holder of real property".

63 posted on 10/21/2013 3:14:22 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (It's been over 90 days; time to start on 2014. Carpe GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: ExGeeEye
The first time I heard that, it took me less than a minute to think of two ways it could be abused to the detriment of the Republic; one way leads to a landed elite making all the decisions (AKA feudalism), and the other to a dilution of the vote as bad as, possibly worse than, the way it is today.

It worked from 1790 to 1850. But yes, in 1790 only 10% of the population of the US could vote (white males mostly).

80 posted on 10/21/2013 3:26:12 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson