She appears to be obsessive. Dangerous to humans? No evidence.
Clearly, she doesn’t love her animals enough to wish them to live a full life.
But, once again, I have to ask - what makes the behavior criminal? She did not starve the dog to death. She did not withdraw water from it. It was legally her dog.
Her methodology is far beneath any I would choose, if forced to do so. But I still don’t understand what made the act criminal.
This behavior is one of the few which would actually make me question her trustworthiness. I agree no solid evidence despite the constant mantra of “serial killers killed animals”. Lots of boys killed animals for fun, but I don’t think nearly that many went on to kill even 1 human. The difference here is a grown woman doing something truly cruel, not just shooting him. It is hair-raising.
It’s only criminal if they have cruelty laws. But it still could be used against her, as I say in a sanity case.
Unnecessary cruelty to an animal. That’s one crime.
This sort of behaviour should ring alarm bells. Is it safe to have her loose on the streets?
Jeffrey Dahmer, like many psychopath murderers started off torturing animals.
He progressed to killing and eating human beings. By some estimates, he ate 27 of them.
Tell me again this woman is in no way dangerous to other human beings.