Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why This Harvard Economist Is Pulling All His Money From Bank Of America
Zerohedge ^ | 1/31/14 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 01/31/2014 5:00:19 PM PST by Kartographer

From Terry Burnham, former Harvard economics professor, author of “Mean Genes” and “Mean Markets and Lizard Brains,” provocative poster on this page and long-time critic of the Federal Reserve, argues that the Fed’s efforts to strengthen America’s banks have perversely weakened them. First posted in PBS.

Is your money safe at the bank? An economist says ‘no’ and withdraws his

Last week I had over $1,000,000 in a checking account at Bank of America. Next week, I will have $10,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: banks; boa; economiccollapse; financialcollapse; preparedness; prepper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: FredZarguna

do kidnappers take a check?
Wouldn’t keep that sort of cash in a checking account. Too many hackers and it seems that cyber security is only slightly better than keeping cash in a cardboard box.


61 posted on 02/01/2014 9:11:26 AM PST by Yorlik803 ( Church/Caboose in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Minimum $25.00 to open account. Otherwise no minimum balance. Amounts over $25,000 earn practically 0%.

You could theoretically have another family member open a second account, but that account would have to meet the same direct deposit and debit card transaction requirements. Also, I am not sure they would let you have two of these accounts at the same address.


62 posted on 02/01/2014 10:17:35 AM PST by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bgill
"Not to mention that the FDIC will belly laugh at those who believe their money is safely insured."

Exactly...the discussions on this thread about FDIC limits are hilarious. I'm not counting on a single dollar of "coverage".

63 posted on 02/01/2014 11:14:34 AM PST by Mich Patriot (PITCH BLACK is the new "transparent")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
My money market is making considerably more than 0.1, don't care about yours, and not surprised given the quality of your financial "advice."

You are of the opinion that a money market insured to $250K is less safe than a checking account insured to $250K under the same conditions in which there could be a collapse as described in this article?

O... K...

Like I said. Not interested in taking financial advice from someone who knows so little.

64 posted on 02/01/2014 12:28:07 PM PST by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

“...the FDIC has enough money to cover only a small portion of the nation’s banking deposits. As Peter Schiff says, “While the FDIC currently has about $25 billion available to bail out failing banks in the event of isolated events (mainly held in U.S. treasuries that would need to be sold), it insures more than $10 trillion in deposits.”
From the book “Game Plan” by Kevin Freeman.


65 posted on 02/03/2014 12:08:13 AM PST by Humidston (For the first time in my adult life I FEAR my government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

>>> I wouldn’t question his placement of the cash but I would question THE WITHDRAWAL of his cash.
>>> That’s what I’m doing in weekly withdrawals to build up a little cushion. I’d advise others to just maybe get 1 or 2 months of cash and maybe find a nice little niche for it, just in case we have a bank holiday. Remember that safety deposit boxes are also not your property, the contents can be held till the bank decides to open its doors.

I’ll second (or third, or fourth) that. Banks - credit unions too - seem to come up with ever more creative excuses to avoid distributing cash to the very depositors who earned it and own it. Even an acknowledged “bank error” is likely to entangle one’s assets indefinitely until it all gets sorted out. Meanwhile, how do you the poor shlep even gas up the car at the pump to respond to perhaps an unforeseen family crisis without the cooperation of the dubiously “safe” institutional computer clutching at your electronic money? Cut the middleman out for having outlived his usefulness.

In my most desperate situations of the past 5 years, financial institutions requiring that I explain how I spent (or earned!) my own money have only served as stress enhancers. Fie on all of them! I’m freeing my moeny from the buzzards as soon as I am able.


66 posted on 02/03/2014 10:19:30 PM PST by Titan Magroyne (What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson