Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress doesn't work for us
The Thanks Project ^ | 3/21/14 | Steve Berman

Posted on 03/21/2014 5:04:32 AM PDT by lifeofgrace

The United States Congress does not work for us.

As in you and me.

I have come to this somber conclusion after reading enough articles, blogs, facts, and budget numbers to make an actuary cross-eyed.

And I feel more at peace now because I can say “wow, that explains a lot. That explains everything.”

I won’t inflict blindness on you by citing every possible statistic here.

Here’s a few:

⁃ Starting Congressional Base Salary $174,000 ⁃ Average First Year Attorney Salary - Washington DC: $160,000 ⁃ Total Congressional Pay + Expenses (not including office expenditures): $233,000,000 ⁃ Estimated Total Campaign Funding in 2014: $1,049,000,000

The amount spent on Congress includes expenses and benefits for active members (not including pensions and other fringe benefits that can’t easily be tracked).

It costs 4 times the amount the government spends on Congress to elect them to office every 2 years (6 years for Senate).

The parties have a $74 million war chest, after raising $364 million in 2013. The Super PACs raised an additional $141 million so far.

Common sense rule: you work for who pays you.

(Excerpt) Read more at thanks-project.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: campaign; congress; parties
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
I would post the whole article but it's too long...so for the excerpt police, I did try.
1 posted on 03/21/2014 5:04:32 AM PDT by lifeofgrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

Are you laboring under the misconception that FReepers are attention challenged?

The article at you Blog is only a couple of paragraphs longer than what you posted. If you’d just quit hitting that “excerpt” button, it would fit just fine.


2 posted on 03/21/2014 5:12:13 AM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

My guess is that a light bulb went off in the guy’s head when he saw one of the new Hotels.com Captain Obvious commercials. Somebody might tell this wizard to go shave the beard that grew while he was still asleep.


3 posted on 03/21/2014 5:17:43 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

Mom’s calling.

Your PB & J is ready


4 posted on 03/21/2014 5:26:16 AM PDT by maine yankee (I got my Governor at 'Marden's')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

When the system comes back and says “it won’t post because it’s too long” am I supposed to edit it down to size?


5 posted on 03/21/2014 11:53:50 AM PDT by lifeofgrace (Follow me on Twitter @lifeofgrace224)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee

I guess I have to consider the audience here...you guys are more educated so I will stop posting anything elementary here.

I might even stop posting here, period given the hostility.


6 posted on 03/21/2014 11:53:50 AM PDT by lifeofgrace (Follow me on Twitter @lifeofgrace224)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace
When the system comes back and says “it won’t post because it’s too long” am I supposed to edit it down to size?

Leave the excerpt button alone and that won't happen.

I might even stop posting here, period given the hostility.

Posting your material is never met with hostility, other than that to objectionable philosophies.

Excerpting your blog to get hits is often met with extreme hostility by some folks here.

I've never understood it. Best just not to excerpt I guess.

7 posted on 03/21/2014 12:11:27 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

Great article.

How about posting the excerpt then continue the rest of it in your first post.
Just make a note about it that fact at the end of the excerpt.

Don’t get mad, just follow the guidelines.

If people like the article they will still click on the blog link.
I do it all the time.

There are reasons for the rule and the boss makes them.
“Ours is not to ask the reasons why”.

You should just cut and paste it and try again.


8 posted on 03/21/2014 12:27:24 PM PDT by right way right (America has embraced the suck of Freedumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Hostile?
Heck, your being nice today.


9 posted on 03/21/2014 12:34:47 PM PDT by right way right (America has embraced the suck of Freedumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: right way right
Heck, your being nice today.

It'll pass.

10 posted on 03/21/2014 12:38:33 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace
"When the system comes back and says “it won’t post because it’s too long” am I supposed to edit it down to size?"

That message will only appear if you:

A - Try to post from a restricted source. (Your blog is not one of those.)

B - Check the box that says "This is an excerpt" before you post.

Stop checking the "excerpt" box and everything will be fine.

No one is complaining about you content. We are complaining about the *lack* of your content in your posts here.

11 posted on 03/21/2014 1:26:01 PM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace
Congress doesn't work for us

The United States Congress does not work for us.

Us, as in you and me.

I have come to this somber conclusion after reading enough articles, blogs, facts, and budget numbers to make an actuary cross-eyed.

And I feel more at peace now because I can say “wow, that explains a lot.  That explains everything.”

I won’t inflict blindness on you by citing every possible statistic here (I do have support for all of these, but not published here).

Here’s a few:

The amount spent on Congress includes expenses and benefits for active members (not including pensions and other fringe benefits that can’t easily be tracked).

It costs 4 times the amount the government spends on Congress to elect them to office every 2 years (6 years for Senate).

The parties have a $74 million war chest, after raising $364 million in 2013.  The Super PACs raised an additional $141 million so far.

Common sense rule:  you work for who pays you.

Politicians get to keep the money they raise, it’s cash.  The campaign finance rules have enough loopholes you can drive a Brinks truck through (and they do!).  A billion dollars will run through the hands of these politicians in the 2014 election cycle.  This is money raised by PACs, their own organizations, but really, mostly, and under the control of, the political parties.

There’s such a web of cronies who work for the parties, for their own PACs and consultancies and committees and campaigns, that Sherlock Holmes might not be able to sort through.  But one thing remains true:  follow the money, and you find the bosses.

Our Congress works for the parties

The Democratic and Republican parties are the bosses of Congress.  They control the money that keeps these people elected.  The movers and shakers are with the parties.  The front-men and women are in Congress, doing their bidding.

Not our bidding.

They throw us bones, call us “constituents”, play for our votes.

But they don’t work for us.

This is seen in practice.  Try to run for Congress.  Join the local party.  Go to all the meetings.  Work for the party, help get out the vote.  Do your part.

When you announce you are going to run, and start raising money, you’ll get a phone call.   They’ll tell you where their money is going.  Probably not to you.  They’ll recommend that you don’t run, why split the party, why rock the boat?  Back the guy or gal we’re backing.  If you don’t, then expect nothing from us.  Zero.  And without us, you can’t win, that’s what they’ll say.

And most of the time, the great majority of the time, it’s true.

There’s a great potential for tyranny when the officials we elect to represent us in our national legislature don’t, in fact, represent us.

A radical solution

Allow me to suggest a solution.  No, it’s not to dismantle the parties.  No, it’s not revolution, although it might seem like one.

It’s very simple.

Pay Congress what they should be making in Washington D.C., in the job we, the people, have hired them to do.  Then severely limit the power of the parties to funnel all that cash.

Members of Congress and Senators make between $174,000 to $225,000 per year.  That’s about what a third-year non-partner lawyer makes in Washington D.C.  Partners in law firms and senior attorneys make upwards of $300,000 to $1.2 million (or more).  Let’s increase Congressional pay to $500,000 to $750,000 for leadership.  Let’s increase their expense accounts to $300,000 per member, and let them spend it on travel, clothing, whatever they need to do their jobs.

Then let’s limit the amount that can be spent on campaigns.  It currently costs $1.6 million to run for Congress.  That’s ridiculous.  It costs over $10 million to run for Senate.  Preposterous.  A complete waste of money, and a sinkhole fraught with corruption.

How about $500,000 maximum for a House race, and $4 million for Senate?  And the Super PACs can raise whatever they want (the Supreme Court took care of that).  But if they can’t spend it in direct support of any candidate, their role would be limited to attack ads, and agenda-setting.

The goal is simple:  attract people to Congress because it’s a job to be done, to serve the people who elect them, and compensate them for that.

We need to correct the grievous imbalance in money and start to disassemble the web of cronyism and corruption in election funding.

How it can be done

The only sane way to do it is to find candidates to run in districts where the parties have less control, where they are not putting a lot of money in, and get those candidates into office.  Candidates who are committed to working for us, and willing to take up this effort, session by session.

Yes, the parties will resist, but if this is possible at all, it has to start with us, the people.

I am worried that it might be too late though.  We might be past the point of regaining control.  We might be where England is, where the parties control a “slate” and if you don’t toe the line, they run you in a district where you are guaranteed to lose.

But it’s possible that we can succeed.

At least it’s a dream, and dreams are powerful things.



at 4:34 AM
12 posted on 03/21/2014 5:37:06 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Don’t worry about this guy.....He is an Exert Nazi.

I am monitoring him


13 posted on 03/24/2014 4:31:19 PM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jayster
Don’t worry about this guy.

I won't.

He is an Exert Nazi.

Exert is blessed!

I am monitoring him

This is series.

14 posted on 03/24/2014 4:36:31 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Watching you......


15 posted on 03/24/2014 4:43:29 PM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: humblegunner
Hmmmm.... And why would you put that in your profile? Me thinks you are a troll and I will be exposing you as such.
17 posted on 03/24/2014 5:04:12 PM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Uh-oh. I think he’s onto you.


18 posted on 03/24/2014 5:05:13 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jayster; humblegunner; TheOldLady; Billthedrill; 50mm; Larry Lucido; Servant of the Cross; ...
"Don’t worry about this guy.....He is an Exert Nazi.

I am monitoring him"

Just though you folks should all know.

It appears there is a new sheriff - er - "monitor" in town.


19 posted on 03/24/2014 6:32:00 PM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Bingo......I am watching the watchers.


20 posted on 03/24/2014 6:42:41 PM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson