Posted on 03/23/2014 11:47:27 AM PDT by smoothsailing
Does kissing the Pope’s ring exonerate a so-called pro-abortion catholic? Pretty shameful stuff...she can be one or the other but she cannot be both.
Thanks smoothsailing.
She knows whom here political allies and friends are.
All those klansmen in the picture are democrats... and NO they did NOT become Republicans when the sixties came ... they stayed democrats ( well, except for Lester Maddox... he really did switch)
Any chance her bishop will take any action yet?
I mentioned all of this to an ardently black colleague and it was like trying to force two south-pole magnets together. He once told me that aborting poor “n*gg*rs” was okay by him. He came from a very wealthy family. I considered him the most racist man I personally knew. He frequently said things like, “Your people did (insert slavery comment here.)” I always responded, “On my mother’s side they fought on the side of the North. On my father’s side they got here in 1921.”
Every time a bishop, priest, deacon or other minister of Communion knowingly gives Communion to a publicly-proclaimed pro-abortion person, he commits a mortal sin.
This is the case because that act ALWAYS gives grave scandal and is ALWAYS to collaborate in the sacrilegious reception of Communion.
Canon 915 exists BECAUSE the foregoing is true. Canon 915 does not make that act a mortal sin.
The majority of bishops in America insist that their priests and other ministers of Communion give the Sacrament to pro-abortion politicians.
Therefore: the majority of bishops in America are walking around habitually in the state of mortal sin.
Unless the laity start making more noise about this scandal, it will continue to eat the heart out of the Catholic Church in the United States.
When I saw the headline I immediately thought ahhh good old Margret Sanger still at it
And unlike Bobby Byrd Lester knew that the KKK was wrong in their beliefs
I’m a Protestant, so I’m not really in the know about matters of the Catholic Faith.
I guess she answers to the San Francisco ArchDiocese
See also Arthur McGowan’s post #8
I am church going Catholic and I would get out of line for communion if I saw her standing in line. I would call her out as the heretic blasphemer that she is. I would call on the priest to deny her communion for willful and continuing support of the murder of unborn children.
I dont understand how so many Catholics can continue to vote Democrat (many of my own family members among them).
Besides abortion I can not see how Catholics can support the false charity of social welfare programs.
True charity must be freely given. True charity must be humbly accepted. Neither is true of social welfare programs.
Yep, the KKK was well known as the militant arm of the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party only started playing that down when blacks started voting in meaningful numbers.
You failed to mention that Margaret Sanger also wanted the retarded, insane, those with venereal diseases and a host of other ‘undesirables’ sterilized and segregated form the rest of the population. She sent a letter of congratulations to one Adolf Hitler on his infanticide program and the German National Socialist hierarchy took Sanger’s work as inspiration for its Final Solution.
Sanger was listed as # 7 on The Nation’s list, compiled by Peter Drucker, of the most influential progressives of the twentieth century.
“And unlike Bobby Byrd Lester knew that the KKK was wrong in their beliefs”
Maddox passed out axe handles at his restaurant for patrons to use to discourage blacks from dining there.
The fact that Pelosi’s home is in San Francisco and she receives Communion in the Washington area is totally irrelevant.
One of Cardinal Wuerl’s many red herrings is that Nancy Pelosi is “not part of my flock.”
Here’s what matters:
Pelosi is a notorious grave sinner. She promotes many grave evils, abortion among them.
She receives Communion. Practically ANY minister of Communion commits a mortal sin by giving her Communion, precisely because of her notoriety. Of course, a Communion minister who genuinely does not know who Pelosi is is not guilty of sin for giving her Communion.
Wuerl has NO RIGHT to tell ANYONE to give Pelosi Communion. Yet, his having a “Pastoral Approach” is just his fanciful name for commanding his priests, deacons, and other ministers of Communion to give Pelosi Communion.
So, you can see: Pelosi’s residence is a total, absolute diversion. It has no relevance whatsoever. Since Wuerl has NO authority to command anyone to disobey Canon 915, he has no authority to command anyone to give Pelosi Communion.
Yup, those Klansmen and Klanswomen were/are Dems. Puzzles the Hell out of me why blacks go for the Democrat party as they do.
Fitting...PP highest award is named after the evil eugenist. Margaret Sanger....the original Abortion Barbie.
Thank you for your post. It has helped me to understand the proper role of the priests and bishops of a faith I know little about.
No! If the bishops had any intestinal fortitude, they would have started to speak against Pelosi, Biden, etal a long time ago. It harkens back to the time when Saint Thomas More was standing up for his faith and the bishops crumbled. If they would start standing up and remembering that little slap they got when they were confirmed, the democrat phoney politicians would be all done. The Catholics who vote democrat regardless would have to start to think, and the tide would start to turn. When the bishops stand speechless, Catholics think they can vote for whoever they want. Funny to me when I hear a democrat say you can’t be a one-issue voter. What exactly are they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.