Posted on 06/02/2014 11:02:09 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
This article from 2012 said he would remain in power even if he lost, so I guess it’s been pushed to 2016:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/46516
It would make sense that if they were going to release an American in exchange for five of their goat-fornicators, they’d choose one (assuming they chose the one to release) that was secretly one of their own. Why wouldn’t they?
There must still be at least a splinter group loyal to America in our American intelligence agencies. Someone needs to release that "major classified file" pronto, and to hell with the consequences.
Wow - what makes them think that?
Maybe that the Taliban tends to kill most of their captives and this guy’s been alive for five years?
100 Days of Being a Laughingstock in Paris (Obama versus the CIA)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2298074/posts
1 traitor=5 terrorists. the new american currency
I agree.
The game plan seems to be create a national disaster (riots, collapse of the economy, health industry etc) and, by executive order, claim there is too much unrest for an election and that you (Obama) will stay in control until things settle down.
That’s been my scenario for the last 4 years.
When does bammy have him over?
and looks well fed and healthy.
something is fishy, indeed
Notice when Obama is with the traitor's father and the moment the father start with his Al Quaida speak, Obama has a crap eating grin on his face which almost seems it was one of the few times he's been proud of this country hear the words Alla Akbar coming from an actual American.
A former intelligence official told the Washington Times that military officials fought the White House and the State Department for a stronger deal but that this deal turned out the way it did because “the administration wanted to close the door on this no matter what the price was.”
Why did they so badly want this to go away that they were willing to risk the political price they’re now paying?
If Bergdahl were the biggest hero in American military history 0bama still committed high treason by letting the five highest order terrorists in custody go.
Do you think America will allow that?
I think the deals real reason was an agreement with the Taliban to stand down during our Bug Out so that Dear Leader doesn’t get embarrassed. Getting our “ prisoner” back is just the cover story...
Collaboration by who? Obama? Duh.
First, he’s doing all of this to tell Americans who voted for him just how he fooled them.
Second, he’s poking his finger in the eyes of those who didn’t vote for him.
Third, why is it that not one person will fall on his sword for America?
And fourth, I hope Snowden has info on all of this and the Guardian releases it.
yes. seriously, yes.
Like the old parable about putting a frog in a pot of hot water vs a cold one and raising the temperature slowly.
We have been in a pot of cold water and the temp has been rising while we have been busy with our iPhones and pushing all sorts of meaningless, and diverting, social agendas. The country is primed for a dictator.
O has aided and abetted our enemies long before he became POTUS -
His traitorous touch now has almost unlimited reach and scope.
He could be caught on video committing murder in the WH and any who protested would be called racist and it would be dismissed as a false scandal driven by his political enemies.
Such is our brave new world. We asked for it, bought it, paid for it, and have supported it.
Bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.