Skip to comments.
Weimaraner dog shot dead in owner’s back yard by police
Daily Mail ^
| , 25 June 2014
| JILL REILLY
Posted on 06/25/2014 12:20:21 PM PDT by moonshinner_09
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
How do they not search the basement ??? I hope this guy sues the police dept..
To: moonshinner_09
'The only thing that I would be satisfied with is having this officer terminated,' said KendallLike the dog?
2
posted on
06/25/2014 12:22:00 PM PDT
by
Paine in the Neck
(Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
To: moonshinner_09
When are cops going to realize how vulnerable they are out in public?They are building for themselves a reservoir of hate and resentment.
3
posted on
06/25/2014 12:26:54 PM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: moonshinner_09
“’A child is missing, and if youre a parent, you would want us to look everywhere for your child. We wouldnt want to leave any stone unturned.’”
No, you do not get to trespass on private property without the consent of the owner.
4
posted on
06/25/2014 12:29:01 PM PDT
by
Twotone
(Marte Et Clypeo)
To: moonshinner_09
Chief Wiggum - from parody figure to video instructor.
5
posted on
06/25/2014 12:31:01 PM PDT
by
relictele
(Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
To: Twotone
No, you do not get to trespass on private property without the consent of the owner.Exactly!
"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry." -- Thomas Jefferson
What do you think would be the result if Mr Kendal had been looking for his son in the officer's yard and shot the officer's dog?
6
posted on
06/25/2014 12:33:13 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: moonshinner_09
7
posted on
06/25/2014 12:33:41 PM PDT
by
x1stcav
("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
To: moonshinner_09
Good thing the police did not start searching in the house of the missing child. They may have shot their dog as well.
To: moonshinner_09
9
posted on
06/25/2014 12:37:36 PM PDT
by
NEMDF
To: moonshinner_09
I fear it’s just a matter of time until Dog Owners start shooting the Police for shooting their dog.
10
posted on
06/25/2014 12:38:14 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: moonshinner_09
12
posted on
06/25/2014 12:40:55 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: Kartographer; All
you forgot the CAGED! Parakeets from Chicago a few months back.
13
posted on
06/25/2014 12:45:12 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Jihadist/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
To: moonshinner_09
I say fire the loser. Maybe the “extenuating circumstances” keep the dog-killing from rising to the level of criminality; but at the very least, the cop displayed such gross incompetence on the job that he should not be trusted with a gun and should be told to hit the road.
14
posted on
06/25/2014 12:47:52 PM PDT
by
Sans-Culotte
(Psalm 14:1 ~ The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”)
To: moonshinner_09
Why not just knock on the dog owner’s door and ask permission to search for the missing child? The dog and cop would have been introduced and there would have been no confrontation. Trades people, who are total strangers, repeatedly come to my house, get introduced tony 85 lb. Pitador and 110 lb. Great Dane, receive very friendly greetings, and go about their business. The same would happen with a poise officer. There’s just no need for shootings like these in cases where the dogs’ owners aren’t suspected of any crimes.
To: moonshinner_09
Police said the officer who was searching in Kendall's yard felt the dog was aggressive and going to attack him Yeah, the dog probably barked happily and wagged his tail. That, in the mind of a dog-hating cop, is "aggression."
16
posted on
06/25/2014 1:13:48 PM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
To: libstripper
Theres just no need for shootings like these in cases where the dogs owners arent suspected of any crimes. Of course there's no "need." It's a "want" thing.
17
posted on
06/25/2014 1:14:43 PM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
To: Joe 6-pack
18
posted on
06/25/2014 1:23:59 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: ScottinVA
I had a beagle when I was a teenager. If anybody came running into the back yard and startled Buddy, he’d go running toward the person, barking like mad. My two present cogs, a Pitador and Great Dane, do the same thing when anybody drives into the driveway. That’s just the way dogs are.
Many years ago my late father was a real estate broker who specialized in rural real estate. Whenever he drove up to a home he’d always make plenty of noise to make sure he attracted the dogs and didn’t startle any of them. Never got bitten by any dogs.
Lots of these cops don’t seem to have any idea how to deal with normal, inquisitive , barking, friendly dogs.
To: Twotone
Worst of all, the vast majority of property owners would consent to that type of searching an instant, meaning there’s no reason for the police not to ask for it, just to prevent this kind of tragedy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson