Doubling down on red herrings will get you nowhere, madam. Offer some substantive arguments or I’ll take you to be another mindless Willardbot (or would it be Bakerbot ?) cheerleader.
RINO Governors have moved the state to the left over the decades, but most especially since the cancer known as William Weld laid to waste a resurging state party in the ‘90s, to be buried by Willard 16 years later.
And, in fact, thanks to the RINO Governors enhancing the numbers of Democrats in the General Court to the point the GOP can caucus in a phone booth, that’s yet one more example of how they pushed the state to the left. Mike Dukakis could not accomplish such a feat (and may I remind you the state had not jumped off the cliff prior to the ‘90s, it was Dems Ed King & Dukakis, that the state last voted GOP for President). How’d that work out for the post-1990 Governors ?
You are so wrong about MA politics.
Governors in that state have little to no power. The power lies with the legislature which is 90% Democratic and to a lesser extent the supreme court and and entrenched union/dem populace. And then there is the Irish Mofia and the other Mofia based in Providence.
Governors are moved by the people there. In no way they move the state anywhere.
So why are you interested in how liberals vote in a liberal state 750 miles from you?