That quote has no source and is of recent vintage. Makes FR look bad.
Consider these points.
The people who are saying that she did not say it are progressive-libs, which would mean that she probably did say it and does not want us to know.
When a legitimate historian (or crime detective) does research they have to gather all the facts wherever they hide, be they in the actions of the person or verifiable innuendo. They lay out everything as they find them and proceed to make sense of what they have before them.
When you look at the actions of Barack Obama and his closest political confidante, Valerie Jarrett, there are just so many details that when you put them on a visual board key factors are immediately noticeable. For example, every action which puts our country in immanent danger that Obama and Jarrett have refused to rectify ... enforces the claim that neither of them are interested in our ultimate welfare, so much so that we are increasingly put into harms way.
If they are not interested in protecting us from sworn enemies to America, then it should make every American citizen question the every motive of Barack and Jarrett.
It would take specific detective work to find the exact quote, which she may well have hidden.
It behooves us to ask ourselves, if she didn't say it could she really mean those sentiments displayed in the quote? And the only answer, by looking at all of their actions to not protect American interests is YES, she means us harm and very well could have said those words.