Anti-Climate Skeptic Film Merchants of Doubt Bombs at Box Office
But will anyone in the media besides cranky conservative websites take the ridiculous hypocrites to task for it?
Well, after all, he promised us “change,” didn’t he?
A gallon of fuel weighs about 7 pounds, so I have doubts how the above could be possible.
Maybe they refuse to travel together.
Any charges pending against them for helping to kill mother erf?
Isn’t it wonderful that those of us who pay taxes are financing all their travel. They better enjoy it now, because in two more years, they will have to pay their own way. Oh, the horror!
I think she takes her own plane so there is no media to see her stuff her face with junk food, ribs and fried chicken.
Do you really think they like each other enough to want to travel together if someone else is paying?
It is okay, thought, for them to take 2 planes to California, etc., because they are doing things to save the little people.
So what if it is going to cost those little people increased taxes; this is to help them.
Just like the starvation-type school lunches are designed to save kids from becoming obese. And don’t compare that with the Obama kids’ school lunches, because, well, they are above the little people.
So, eat your peas and shut up!
[/s]
According to the first sentence, a gallon of jet fuel creates about 19 pounds of CO2. That seems about right to me from the chemical equation for the reaction. A gallon of jet fuel weighs about 7 pounds. It is less dense than water.
Then the article says that 287,000 pouns of fuel results in 5,462,500 pounds of CO2.
Sorry, the math does not work. 7/19 is 2.71 pounds of CO2 per pound of fuel. So 287,000 pounds of fuel is 779,000 pounds of fuel, not 5,462,500.
There is no need to exaggerate to maike the point.
It’s settled science. The rich and affluent do not cause global warming.
Or
Maybe they bought Carbon Credits from Al Gore.
How does 7 pounds of liquid create 19 pounds of CO2?
How many BBQ grills is that?
CO2 doesn’t weigh anything anyway,,,, this is retarded.
You know, has anyone bothered teleconferencing to talk about climate change? I mean even simpletons like myself can amass a large group of 4 or more parties computers with camera recorders and speakers chatting on a google plus hangout or skype video chat and the bigwigs don’t try their own equivalent of it? What are they living in, the 90s?
.
Aren’t those emissions carbon monoxide, rather than carbon dioxide?
Of course it is. Next.