Arguably, Governor Jindal is the most conservative on a variety of issues, including immigration, right to life, military strength, taxes, regulations, trade, etc.
Governor Jindal seems to suffer from the delusion that the top management of corporations is interested in advancing free enterprise. I see precious little evidence of this in general, though there are rare exceptions, most notably the Koch brothers who are so heavily vilified precisely because they actually favor free-market measures, rather than being easily bought with government contracts or regulations that advantage their business against competitors or potential competitors.
By and large pro-business has ceased to mean pro-market. Corporate managers by and large seek to use government policy to cement their market position and are happy with a great deal of regulation, since regulation harms new entrants and small enterprises far more than it does large incumbents in the market.
I really like Jindal. The problem here, however, is that boardrooms reflect shareholder sentiments. CalPERS and other collectivist entities own enough shares to determine board composition. They vote their values, which are collectivist.
This kind of unequivocal steadfastness is a reason that Jindal is one of the only GOP-er’s besides Cruz that I even remotely bother to pay attention to.
I like him. He is a great man and would make a great VP for President Paul.
This must be driving the left crazy. The GOP has four potential candidates of color in Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson, and Bobby Jindal. Looking at the potential cast of clowns, er characters, who might take on Hillary. Hmm. Let’s see here Fauxahontas Warren, Uncle Joe Biden, Martin O’Malley, Comrade Bill de Blasio, Commissar Bernie Sanders, and Algore. Those are all white candidates. What happened to the Democrats and all that diversity talk of theirs.