Posted on 05/30/2015 2:03:04 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Does Hillary Rodham Clinton have a moral compass?
If so, what informs and guides it?
If not, why is the Democratic Party behind her candidacy?
Why does the media pretend that they can't ask her the hard questions?
Why does the media toss her soft ball questions?
What are her qualifications?
What are her bedrock beliefs?
Why is she running?
Who would she put on the Supreme Court?
How would she treat our military?
Does she have Executive Order Syndrome too?
Why is she trying so hard to pretend Bill Clinton is just a fancy hood ornament?
Why is Bill Clinton trying so hard to pretend Hillary Clinton would be a good president?
How much damage have the Clintons done to the United States behind the scenes?
Who, and what do they owe for the nearly $2B that has been given to their Clinton Family Foundation?
Why does this matter?
well forget about getting any help from the press. They gave her a standing ovation for joking about breaking federal laws with her private emails
Uh, she has none. Spawn of Satan. Period.
I would mount Hillary!’s moral compass
on the ceiling and use it for a ceiling fan,
except it only has one speed.....HIGH.
So I guess we should say that the media works for the Clinton Family.
No she has no moral compass. She is an acolyte of Saul Alinsky. Her “bible” is Alinsky’s book Rules For Radicals. She would put radicals on the Supreme Court. She is running because she feel entitled to be president for putting up with Bill all these years. She has no core beliefs aside from Alinsky tactics and liberal thought.
Her moral ‘compass’ is missing its lodestone!
certainly in support of her.
Moral compass??? Lets see death, stealing, letting Bill treat you like a floormat, drug running...What moral compass??
This woman...and I use that term loosely has absolutely no morals what so ever.
What guides her is money, and the personal acquisition thereof.
CHICAGO — “The job offer to “Miss Hillary Rodham, Wellesley College” was dated Oct. 25, 1968, and signed by Saul D. Alinsky, the charismatic community organizer who believed that the urban poor could become their own best advocates in a world that largely ignored them.
Alinsky thought highly of 21-year-old Rodham, a student government president who grew up in the Chicago suburbs. She was in the midst of a year-long analysis of Alinsky’s aggressive mobilizing tactics, and he was searching for “competent political literates” to move to Chicago to build grass-roots organizations.”....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/24/AR2007032401152.html
The Wash/Post reports Hillary earned $11.7 million for 51 speeches since Jan 2014.....she pocketed an astonishing $625,000 for two speeches in one day!
I firmly believe the Clinton Foundation's gigantic donor list, and their astonishing blizzard of speaking honoraria, are a smoke screen for their secret wealth----and the way they make billions sub rosa---intertwining their vaunted "charity" work and public office.
The calculated Clintons have sought to branch out into other business activities......though little is known about the exact nature and financial worth of Bill and Hillary’s non-speech business interests.
Recent reports indicate the Clintons were party to multi-billion dollar Mideast arms deals....Kazakhstan uranium mines....and Haitian gold mines...
THE CON ARTISTS SOLD EVERYTHNG THAT WASNT NAILED DOWN---Lucrative business interests were cunningly intertwined w/ their Foundation's "do-good" activities....and enabled by Hillary's catbird seat at the State Dept.
===============================================
TAXPAYERS DEMAND LAWS WHICH PREVENT POLITICAL APPOINTEES FROM FORMING FOUNDATIONS THAT SELL OUT AMERICAN INTERESTS---Obama's still in office and has two Foundations (that we know of)---ready to cash-in like the Clintons.
CONTACT CONGRESS HERE: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
I think the consensus will be that she has no moral compass, no scruples.
Though I would say that she has ambition, greed and feelings of persecution.
That makes her a dangerous person.
You could substitute Hillary Clinton for ANY Democrat and the answer would be the same. No. They are never painted as hypocrites because you must have a moral conviction that you break in order to be a hypocrite.
Democrats are of two varieties: Ignorant and uninformed or outright evil!
The Clintons have never seen a bribe to small to take, or a loyalty to dear to betray.
You make a good point.
At the very least, it’s apparent to everyone that the Democratic Party has become the party of corruption.
Now if that bothers them, that’s entirely another thing.
Moral Compass? Come now Hillary is MD - Morally Deficit! You see a parasite that is Hillary!
Most Democrat voters care only about what is in it for them. Can I still get an abortion for the little minx I bedded down when my wife was away? Can I still get my EBT card renewed on every 1st of the month and my free contraception? Can I still laugh at the Republican John Stewart rearranges videos of to make look stupid?
They are uninformed stupid or evil, often they are all three.
Credit - EIB Rush Limbaugh
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.