Posted on 06/26/2015 9:26:30 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
1) IRS Defense Makes Statement So Outrageous Judge Asks You Dont Really Mean That, Right?
IRS defense in the Z Street v. Koskinen case made such a shocking and absurd argument that the judges presiding over the case were forced to stop and question if the statement was in fact a mistake. The argument in question is that IRS truly believes they should be allowed to discriminate for nine months before anyone is allowed to sue them.
This isnt a joke, the IRS blatantly stated that they believe their culture of discrimination towards religious and conservative groups should be allowed as part of their operating procedure.
The case in question, Z Street v. Koskinen involves IRS discrimination against the group Z Street solely due to that fact the group promotes pro-Israel education. The group applied for tax-exempt status in December of 2009, after seven months they had still not received any response from the IRS and subsequently contacted the IRS to inquire on the delay.
After Z Street was able to contact the IRS they were told that auditors had been instructed to give special attention to groups connected with Israel, and that [the agents] had sent some of those applications to a special IRS unit for additional review.
Obviously this was an issue as the IRS is not permitted to base decisions on viewpoint, religion, race, etc. Naturally, Z Street sued and the IRS has been fighting tooth and nail to prevent this case from being seen in open court ever since.
My Opinion: Just how far is this administration willing to go in illegally forcing its Marxist ideals on the rest of the nation? It is perhaps not a surprise that the IRS should demand it be permitted to discriminate against religious and conservative clients...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.