Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tripwire Alert-Republican Party Admits They are Supporting Ted Cruz So They Can Lose To Hillary
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | 3-24-2016 | sundance

Posted on 03/24/2016 7:35:20 AM PDT by smoothsailing

Remember – There will always be three “Battle Spaces”: ¹ The visible fight. ² The Generals. ³ The Politicians and Wall Street Decision-makers.

Look at this picture carefully.

clinton bush

It’s actually a cropped screen-grab from a republican political ad that first ran in December 2013 when no-one was paying attention to 2016 presidential politics.

Throughout the early spring of 2014 the party ad popped up on various conservative sites and was widely distributed when few were paying attention.

We copied and saved the image, along with a host of other images and research data links, because that picture’s appearance coincided with our initial research into the GOPe roadmap to nominate Jeb Bush.

It was from these initial discoveries, and quietly tracking the various leadership members within the professional republican party and GOPe apparatus in Washington DC, that eventually led us to share the outline of the nomination path they were constructing. Eventually, that became The GOPe Roadmap.

Everything that has taken place from January 2015 to today was/is entirely predictable when you understand their original goals.

So it shouldn’t, at least to those who have read here for a while, come as a surprise to see an article today where the professional republican party admits they are now supporting Ted Cruz because they want Hillary Clinton to win in November ’16:

Republican elders, desperate to stop Donald Trump, are increasingly convinced they would rather forfeit the White House than hand their party to the divisive Manhattan billionaire.

That’s why the party’s establishment is suddenly rallying behind Ted Cruz, a man they’ve long despised and who has little chance, in the view of many GOP veterans, of defeating Hillary Clinton on Election Day. (link)

You should read the entire article; they’re not even trying to hide any more. That’s a rather stark admission from the entire right side camp of the UniParty. They’d rather see Hillary Clinton elected, than to see Donald Trump victorious.

mcconnell ryanThey” includes: the RNC apparatus (which in reality is nothing more than the donors who fund it), and the GOPe apparatus which is the Washington DC based professional arm of the Republican Party, the “establishment” (which includes Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell).

The Globalists, global financiers, Wall Street, and the downstream K-Street legislative Orcs (ex. Tom Donohue) who do their bidding, are doing exactly what we predicted and foretold they would do if they lost Jeb on the other side of their controlled equation.

Now, before moving on to the stuff that might be considered too unfathomable to even contemplate, I will admit this is written exclusively for YOU – so I don’t really want to see this distributed. Unlike most within the blog-o-sphere per se’, what you see on these CTH pages is entirely here under the auspices of an underground conversation. Small is good.

♦ Point One – Every media website, MSM or Alternative, and media outlet MSM or Alternative, is dependent on revenue. Those who control the revenue control the content of those outlets – period. Including large blogs like Lucianne, AT, and the Salem Communications Group (Human Events, Red State, Twitchy,) as examples.

Other obvious examples include: The Wilks Brothers purchased and underwrite The Daily Wire, a Ben Shapiro propaganda site. Robert Mercer purchased and underwrites Breitbart.com. Rupert Murdoch purchased and underwrites Fox News, etc. Each of these are influence agents.

You should think of all media, traditional and non-traditional, as influence agents. Then ask yourself why and what are they trying to influence?

You should do the same thought processing with polls. Almost all polls are influence agents. What and who are they trying to influence? What is the value in broadcasting a Frank Luntz focus group? Why broadcast what a group of people think in Florida? What’s the purpose?… etc.

There are some, a few, valid media polls. But someone always has to pay for the polling process. Again, these are not altruistic endeavors.

♦ Point Two – There will always be things with are true, but unfortunately can never be proven. Two examples:

First Example – I firmly believe the IRS targeting of Tea party and Patriot groups was a specific outcome of 1) the 2010 mid-term “shellacking”, 2) The SCOTUS Citizens United decision, 3) The White House seeking a way in the early years of their term to keep control of their legislative agenda.

Jack Lew (Obama’s Chief of Staff) and various White House agents, met and brainstormed ideas to dilute the position of their opponents. As a consequence the IRS and DOJ scheme to weaponize the Dept. of Treasury began.

After discovery, Jack Lew became secretary of the Dept. of Treasury, insuring protection; and well, you know the rest of the political ‘hide-the-guilty-pea’ shell game. – HERE’s WHY – (w/ dozens of MSM embed links)

Second Example – I firmly believe the Benghazi murder fiasco was blood on the hands of both the Democrats (Via Hillary Clinton/State Dept) -AND- The Republican party leadership (via Intelligence Oversight Gang-of-Eight).

Both presidential finding memos in 2011 (Libya) and 2012 (Syria) authorized the joint State Dept./CIA operations which included various covert arms deals that make Iran/Contra seem like childs-play. The oversight for both operations fell upon the Congressional Intelligence “Gang-of-Eight”. – HERE’s WHY – (w/ hundreds of MSM embed links)

However, despite my own opinion of these two examples being grounded in facts – that I can point to with specific reference and certainty – there’s also never going to be any accountability for either usurpation because both sides of the UniParty benefitted from them.

• The Democrats (White House and Leadership) and Big GOPe Republicans (Leadership) both benefitted from the Tea Party being targeted.

• The Democrats (White House and Leadership) and Big Gope Republicans (Leadership) both benefitted from hiding their duplicity in the Libyan/Syrian covert operations. Both sides of the UniParty (4 members each party – with oversight) have blood on their hands.

Thus neither of these two events can ever hope to find accountability. However, that doesn’t mean the truth underwriting my opinion isn’t real. It just means history will never find the exposition in the news media. 99+% of America is oblivious.

a17b2-hip-replacement-recall-bribery

Here’s the disconcerting unfathomable part.

We could never reconcile, fully reconcile, how Senator Ted Cruz fit into the grand scheme of the GOPe roadmap. For the longest time we could find evidence of his affiliation, but never enough substance to identify the motive. Unlike all of the other “splitters” there simply wasn’t enough historical reference to rule in, or out, a specific motive.

Cruz took office in 2013 and announced his decision to run in March 2015. A short window to find the trail of evidence needed to determine motive. As a consequence we always granted him benefit of the doubt.

However, as time progressed throughout 2015 (post announcement) things clarified which made the October ’13 though July ’14 begin to make more sense. Sometime around late 2015, with mounting evidence of affiliations and activity, I realized with specific certainty that Cruz was NOT outside the roadmap, he was actually within it.

cruz McConnellHowever, the final pixels needed for a clarified motive remained elusive. Well, that was until last week and the revelation which fit like the missing piece of the Cruz/GOPe puzzle.

The GOPe dislikes Ted Cruz for the same reason the larger majority of the U.S. is turned off by him, his transparently inherent ‘do-anything-to-gain-status’ selfishness. The original distrust born NOT because he’s an outsider per se’, but rather because he’s an INSIDER who decided the best way to advance himself was to bite the hand that fed him.

When Ted worked for George W Bush, he was angling for a bigger position than he received. As described, Cruz actually wanted to be the U.S. Attorney General.

Cruz was thinking (as a campaign lawyer who helped win the 00′ Florida election challenge) he had more pull than he actually did. Thinking he possessed more juice because of some of his Texas connections. His marriage to Heidi was supposed to solidify his position because she was actually held in higher regard than Ted within the Texas/GOPe sphere.

Ted Cruz was seen by the insiders as over ambitious, an opinion that was only reenforced by his ambitious reach and expectation to be named Attorney General.

So Ted Cruz decided since he knew the ins and outs of the GOPe (insofar as the GOP and Bushes were one and the same), and since he couldn’t advance any further within that sphere, that he would run against them.

He ran for Senate against a GOPe favorite in 2012 and won. Cruz hoping this would show the GOPe that he was a serious contender and they would welcome him back into the fold.

Except, his actions backfired, mostly because of Ted’s outsider rhetoric, and also because his freshman year (2013) was spent antagonizing the very political group he would need to gain additional influence.

The customary view of Ted Cruz choosing to run for POTUS, appeared on its surface to be a slap in the face Jeb Bush and the GOPe. However, in reality, when considered against the backdrop of the GOPe Roadmap, his run was an olive branch by Ted to the GOPe.

How? Because two-year Senator Ted Cruz entered the race to split the conservative vote in order to help Jeb win.

Cruz was never supposed to be in his current position after Iowa. New Hampshire, was always where Jeb’s path began. Cruz was a needed splitter in the SEC states, and if the race got down to him and Jeb, well, the fact that Ted isn’t natural born was going to come out, forcing him to drop out, leaving Jeb and his millions in donor money as the last man standing.

This is the classic GOP maneuver. An almost identical scheme to the process that allowed Mitt Romney to attain the nomination, with little support, in 2012. Why do you think Jeb always spoke about winning without the base, and also losing the primaries to win the nomination?

In hindsight, it all makes sense now, doesn’t it?

Again, Trump was the wildcard the GOPe didn’t expect. All other angles and players were carefully, strategically, and electorally mapped out. But Trump screwed up the entire plan. In July 2015, not knowing how it would all work out, Ted Cruz was sent to cozy up to Trump with a non-aggression pact, but Trump was no dummy.

Trump also knows the eligibility issue is a major problem, a major problem that can be beneficial at a contested/open convention.

However, no-one knows the scope and multi-trillion dollar consequences of the race better than those who constructed it (Battle Group #3). As an outcome, those who understand the scope of the current race, are also the same power-brokers who work earnestly to control every possible outcome.

Throughout the first two months of 2016; as the race began to take on increasing shape, and against the reality the Trump juggernaut of vulgarians were not going to be easily stopped, Trump’s “eligibility ace-in-the-hole“, would need to be diminished as an insurance policy against Trump being victorious.

How would such influential power-elites remove the risk inherent in the Trump Eligibility Card? Well, if you think deeply enough about it, they’d need to reference prior historical activity when such consequential presidential election decisions are made.

Who would ultimately be making such an emergency eligibility determination? The “Natural Born Citizen” argument has never been settled before. Mostly, because no-one with standing has ever faced a need to challenge its meaning.

But Trump has that “standing”. And Trump has that eligibility challenge available to him. So who would ultimately be charged with making such a consequential decision for all future American politicians to follow?

Follow the problem to its natural conclusion and you’ll find The Supreme Court of The United States. Who on that panel would be most likely to be considered an “originalist” within that body of constitutional decision makers – and who would be virtually guaranteed to side with Trump’s challenge?

Donald Trump won New Hampshire February 9th, 2016. Jeb Bush, who, according to the best laid plans – was supposed to begin rolling down the road of the GOPe roadmap, finished FOURTH.

Donald Trump won South Carolina February 20th. Jeb Bush, again, finished FOURTH with only 7.8% of the vote. Jeb suspended his campaign.

In between New Hampshire on the 9th, and Jeb’s exit on the 20th, was February 13th.

On February 13th, 2016 Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the originalist, died unexpectedly, on a ranch in Texas….

antonin scalia

…. as a direct and specific outcome, and as bizarre as it seems, against the backdrop of the 2016 Presidential election, both sides of the UniParty benefit.

Yet again.

READ MORE...



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016election; ambition; cnsrvtvtreehouse; cruz; gop; gope; hillary; sundance; tinfoilhatsundance; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: smoothsailing

Great article, thank you.


21 posted on 03/24/2016 7:58:11 AM PDT by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Cruz’ presidential aspirations have made him so pathetically desperate to get the nomination that he has sold out to the GOP big money establishment. His campaign is benefitting from a huge influx of money. Where’s that all coming from?


22 posted on 03/24/2016 7:58:49 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Quite a few Mil if you’d Sell the movie rights for this one.


23 posted on 03/24/2016 8:01:23 AM PDT by Macoozie ("Estoy votando por Ted 2016!" bumper stickers available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I like that Sundance analysis things from a power politics perspective.

It is a smart analysis, to be sure.

But the Scalia thing is over the top.

Not that I do not think power politicians are capable of murder; it is just that the linkage here is so tenuous and uncertain that it makes no sense.


24 posted on 03/24/2016 8:01:44 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Cruz will do just fine.
Maybe. The question is, which party will be the first to pursue his eligibility?

I certainly hope no one thinks that's a settled argument.

25 posted on 03/24/2016 8:02:59 AM PDT by lewislynn (Ted Cruz: " I'll never have 'a plane with my name" (or a Presidential seal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski

This is how I see it too. At the convention, Trump will be short a few delegates, and Cruz will be way short; even if Cruz was to have enough delegates, it will decided that he is ineligible.
Bush, or someone like him, will be brought in at the last minute. All planned......


26 posted on 03/24/2016 8:04:23 AM PDT by slipper (Adapt and overcome. God, Family, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The idea that Scalia was killed to stop Ted Cruz from being ruled as ineligible is over the top.


I don't know if he was saying that Scalia was killed, or just that it benefits both. However, there are subjects, like Obama’s BC. that are constantly marked as tin foil hat material, or written off as Conspiracy kookiness. But then you look around at the world, and we do need to be asking these questions, because something nefarious is going on.

I am getting kind of sick of not being able to ask certain questions, and being called names like birther. This is just like racist, and I think it is meant as nothing more than to shut people up.

27 posted on 03/24/2016 8:06:24 AM PDT by magglepuss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
The GPOe is supporting Cruz so Trump does not WIN!

The GOPe can work with Hillary, after all they have worked with Obama all these years.

The basic problem is that all professional politicians believe that government is the solution and Trump does not. That's the problem for the GOPe, a non-believer is leading!

28 posted on 03/24/2016 8:07:01 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Soetoro was very proactive at ensuring that any cases against his eligibility would never advance to an appeals court, and would always be heard by pro-Soetoro judges. If a trial courts judge is intimidated or in some way incapacitated, it’s less likely to get national attention.

The “kill Scalia to advance Cruz” theory doesn’t really hold water when you consider that the GOP-e would rather dispose of Cruz (he’s too unreliable), and that at this point in the election the verdict would only be handed down once Cruz is in office (letting a more reliable GOP-e VP take over the Presidency). Scalia was killed largely because he was a stopgap in the implementation of Soetorocare.


29 posted on 03/24/2016 8:07:10 AM PDT by Objective Scrutator (All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

“I certainly hope no one thinks that’s a settled argument.”

Harvard Law and Cornell Law think its settled. As settled as anything these days.

The parties can’t pursue, only another candidate can.


30 posted on 03/24/2016 8:09:39 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The Uniparty had the script written back then on how they’d entertain us, pretending to give us a choice, and then that Donald came along and ruined the whole thing!


31 posted on 03/24/2016 8:12:31 AM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver; lewislynn

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3378862/posts?q=1&;page=201

SEN.CRUZ WAS BORN IN CANADA TO A MOTHER WHO WAS A CANADIAN CITIZEN AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH.


32 posted on 03/24/2016 8:14:09 AM PDT by PraiseTheLord (have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PraiseTheLord

His mother was an American citizen. Cruz was a US citizen by birthright.

By law Cruz is a natural born citizen. You may not like it but until a court rules otherwise that is how it is.


33 posted on 03/24/2016 8:18:28 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Nope. The original intent of including NBC within the eligibility clause was to prevent a person with foreign influence/allegiance from becoming President and thus CiC. Understanding that intent, which is documented, an NBC means one that only has allegiance to the United States at birth. Dual Citizenship can’t be NBC as it negates the intent of the clause.


34 posted on 03/24/2016 8:25:17 AM PDT by PJBankard (Cruzer is a Snuzer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

His mother was an American citizen. Cruz was a US citizen by birthright.

By law Cruz is a natural born citizen. You may not like it but until a court rules otherwise that is how it is.


You got it — his mother WAS.

But living in Canada and receiving all the benefits of a *Canadian citizen* —— that would be she WAS A CANADIAN CITIZEN WHEN LITTLE TED! WAS BORN —

WAS BORN IN CANADA = NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF CANADA.

Whether you like it or not. Just the facts.


35 posted on 03/24/2016 8:32:11 AM PDT by PraiseTheLord (have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Tripwire Alert-Republican Party Admits They are Supporting Ted Cruz So They Can Lose To Hillary

This is another example of someone who's lost their marbles but doesn't realize it. The Conservative Treehouse does good analysis and investigation of various events that have taken place and they ought to stick with that. Since they've gotten into trying to push their candidate, they are sounding like kooks.

36 posted on 03/24/2016 8:49:09 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

You don’t need a crystal ball to recognize Ted Cruz will be a near certain loser in November. Smart guy, says all the right things, but he has a poor presentation, poor salesman skills, and very little credibility.

If he’s the nominee, I will vote for him. But I won’t invest time, energy, money. or emotion on him. If someone were to ask me why they should vote for Ted Cruz, I couldn’t give them a good reason.

I can tell them why they should not vote for Hillary, but that’s not the question.

I won’t follow the election closely and probably not even tune in on election night. We know the outcome. Everyone with clarity will know the outcome.


37 posted on 03/24/2016 8:53:12 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PraiseTheLord

She held American citizenship and met the legal residency requirements. She’s a US citizen and passed it on to him at birth. He’s a NBC.

Anything else is fantasy.


38 posted on 03/24/2016 9:08:14 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"...divisive Manhattan billionaire"?

Just because he speaks what has been unspoken via Politically Correct cowardice? Truth about illegal immigration, the truth about what it is costing this country; truth about the human bondage traffic crossing our Southern Border daily, the abuse of women and children not only on the long trip to get to America, but the on going human bondage once here...face it, there are really sick people in the USA....(McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952) which Trump would not be afraid to use to stop Muslims from entering the USA for a period of time...for our security and many other issues that need addressing which heretofore were Politically unmentionable. Trump leads....the rest follow...the GOPe wants to retain control over their candidate....lets pray that does not happen.

39 posted on 03/24/2016 9:09:38 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

“The original intent of including NBC within the eligibility clause was to prevent a person with foreign influence/allegiance from becoming President and thus CiC. “

True

“Understanding that intent, which is documented, an NBC means one that only has allegiance to the United States at birth. “

ok

“Dual Citizenship can’t be NBC as it negates the intent of the clause.”

Not according to the law.


40 posted on 03/24/2016 9:10:05 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson