Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
Let me explain something to you, Lame Cherry. If you read the rules, you sure didn't understand them. Nobody is moving the freaking goal posts.

Let me explain something to you. If there are no rules, then there is no reason to have primaries.
14 posted on 03/27/2016 12:09:33 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - He's creepy and he's kooky, mysterious and spooky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: JoSixChip
Let me explain something to you. If there are no rules, then there is no reason to have primaries.

Horsesh*t. Primaries beget the election of delegates to represent the states at the national convention.

The rules concept is no different from how Congress operates by Constitutional design. Each Congress (and each convention) votes on a set rules to govern the elective body. Those rules cannot bind a future Congress (or a convention). Those rules can be amended by the Congress (or convention) who adopted them.

People need to wake the up. They're being incited to anger over a concept that has existed from the foundation of Congress. Attach "GOPe" to it and suddenly a constitutional concept is a conspiracy.

20 posted on 03/27/2016 12:21:41 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip
If there are no rules, then there is no reason to have primaries.

Except as a distraction from what is really going on behind the curtain.

35 posted on 03/27/2016 1:31:25 PM PDT by Chuckster ("Them Rag Heads just ain't rational" Curly Bartley 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson