To: BuckeyeTexan
Let me explain something to you, Lame Cherry. If you read the rules, you sure didn't understand them. Nobody is moving the freaking goal posts.
Let me explain something to you. If there are no rules, then there is no reason to have primaries.
14 posted on
03/27/2016 12:09:33 PM PDT by
JoSixChip
(Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - He's creepy and he's kooky, mysterious and spooky)
To: JoSixChip
Let me explain something to you. If there are no rules, then there is no reason to have primaries. Horsesh*t. Primaries beget the election of delegates to represent the states at the national convention.
The rules concept is no different from how Congress operates by Constitutional design. Each Congress (and each convention) votes on a set rules to govern the elective body. Those rules cannot bind a future Congress (or a convention). Those rules can be amended by the Congress (or convention) who adopted them.
People need to wake the up. They're being incited to anger over a concept that has existed from the foundation of Congress. Attach "GOPe" to it and suddenly a constitutional concept is a conspiracy.
20 posted on
03/27/2016 12:21:41 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: JoSixChip
If there are no rules, then there is no reason to have primaries.Except as a distraction from what is really going on behind the curtain.
35 posted on
03/27/2016 1:31:25 PM PDT by
Chuckster
("Them Rag Heads just ain't rational" Curly Bartley 1973)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson