Posted on 06/13/2016 4:59:44 AM PDT by NOBO2012
Hillary prefers hundreds of thousands of terrorists on our streets and no ability of Americans to fight back.
***It’s a civilian version of a military weapon,***
If you look at history, civilians have always been better armed with common rifles and handguns than the military up until 1956.
When the army adopted a musket, civilians had muzzle loading rifles.
Army-muzzle loading rifle , Civilian-Breech loading rifle.
Army-single shot breech loading rifle, Civilian-lever action multi shot rifles.
Army-5 shot bolt action rifle, Civilian- lever, slide, bolt, semi-auto and first full auto rifles.
1956, army adopts a select fire rifle denied to the civilian population.
Rifles were never a problem until the 1980s when the gun control groups found them to be a “soft target”. Before that time, gun control groups always said they “ONLY WANTED TO CONTROL HANDGUNS! RIFLES AHD SHOTGUNS will not be affected!”
As of this past weekend, Hillary has lost the election.
Muslim terrorists have no place in our streets.
So the police and Secret Service should not be able to have them?
I think the shooter had a permit to carry anyway.
If they shouldn’t be on our streets, then get rid of the Muslims who have them on our streets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.