To: Shadow44
He was a ringer, pure and simple. Willard was there to assure Zero’s re-coronation, to stop a Conservative from being the nominee and derailing the bipartisan leftist cabal ruling class.
To: fieldmarshaldj
Yea, after he dominated in the first debate, his handlers told him to dummy up and cut it out.
To: fieldmarshaldj
“He was a ringer, pure and simple”
There were a few here on FR that thought Trump was the same thing.
12 posted on
09/27/2016 9:42:12 AM PDT by
Jolla
To: fieldmarshaldj
He was a ringer, pure and simple. Willard was there to assure Zero’s re-coronation, to stop a Conservative from being the nominee and derailing the bipartisan leftist cabal ruling class. Yep. The same role that assigned to Jeb this time around.
15 posted on
09/27/2016 9:57:12 AM PDT by
pgkdan
(The Silent MajorityStands With TRUMP!)
To: fieldmarshaldj
But Romney had what voters crave. He had electability.
16 posted on
09/27/2016 10:06:49 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(<a href="https://imgflip.com/i/1adpjl"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/1adpjl.jpg" title="made at im)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson