Step 3: Have Experts Question the Validity of the Election: If a group of supposedly disinterested political scientists question the results of the election because the voting patterns are different than those in prior elections, and a group of computer scientists opine that the voting machines may have been hacked, you now have grounds to ask for a recount. This works so well because throughout the campaign you have been promoting the false narrative that the Russians were trying to influence the election, and Putin wanted Trump to win. A compliant, complicit, and lazy media simply repeated your falsehoods—why do any investigative reporting to determine the truth of assertions that support the candidate of your choice. Now you know, or should know that the Russians actually wanted you to win because having hacked your private server they have enough information about the Clinton Foundation/ State Department nexus to make you very uncomfortable about challenging Russian muscle-flexing.
Spot On
What a witch she is. How can anyone vote for a lying lesbian, add pedophile, foul mouth drunk who gets so ripped she throes crap at people. If she were a man she have had so many fists hit that mouth she could not speak.
I say we need to completely investigate the “experts”. Given her past hirings of computer “experts” I say her judgment is totally flawed on what computer experts are.
Plus their no doubt democrat partisan backgrounds.
Anyone can create statistics to back up whatever claim they want to claim.
It’s not who casts the votes,it’s WHO COUNTS THE VOTES