Three new liberal tactics designed to stop you from hearing conservative arguments

Canada Free Press ^ | 05/01/17 | Herman Cain

[Sean_Anthony]

Actually they're not totally new, but they're sure gaining popularity!

We are all too familiar with the liberals’ S.I.N. tactics (shift the subject, ignore the facts, and name-call) to deny people the opportunity to hear an opposing point of view. They have now increased the frequency of three other blatant tactics to prevent people from hearing conservative truths.

“Shout them down!”

“Shut them down!”

[real saxophonist]

blogass, pimpass, blogass, pimpass, whatthefuckever...

[liberalism is suicide]

These obnoxious tactics don’t sound new to me.

[cgbg]

All liberals have wedge issues--issues where their ideology is in conflict with their own position on a specific issue.

The best way to debate a liberal is to let them talk until you find the wedge--then drive it open..

Examples:

--Women's rights libs vs pro Muslim libs
--Peace--are they for it or against it?
--Corruption--what do they think of liberals who get fat fees for speaking to big banks?
--Conspiracy--how did the Manhattan project (atom bomb development) manage to keep thousands of people quiet during World War II if it is impossible to have a conspiracy?
--Conspiracy, continued--if conspiracies (secrets) are impossible they why does every government and major corporation in the world require security clearances and limited access to information?
--Why are so many rich people liberals?
--Why are so many blue collar workers conservatives?
--If gay marriage is ok why isn't polygamy ok?
--Why are so many universities opposed to free speech?

etc. etc.

[Albion Wilde]

bump