Genital Mutilation Religious Freedom - Sub- Set of a Greater Issue

Conmonsense | Anonymoys

[CharlesOConnell]

So, you're the palace steward of the Caliph of the Ottoman Empire. You have to manage a big haram. You need big strong men with no gonads and no sexual organs to manage your human zoo of sexual chattels.

This is a matter of your religious freedom. It is your tradition that some people are masters -- the Caliph -- and some are slaves. It is based upon the freedom of your religious tradition that Allah is a slavemaster, and all humans, even the Caliph, are slaves.

The inability to perform the orchiectomy surgery upon some non-voluntary male subjects is central to your religion and your tradition.

Suppose the Caliphate loses a war, the empire is conquered by non-Muslim invaders: the Caliph does not disappear, he still has his haram, he still needs new eunuchs. Under a reverse of the millet system, in which Sharia law pertains within the local dominions of the former Caliph, it is a matter of religious freedom that you must be able to castrate involuntary male subjects.

This is a true analogy of the genital mutilation cases now up for consideration, probably, ultimately, before the Supreme Court of the United States. There has been no report of little girls who agreed before hand, "I want my little girl place to be torn out with a surgical instrument." The little girls in these cases seem, by press reports, to have uniformly found the experience very extremely unpleasant, indeed, traumatic.

The western world is at an end-stage, in a disease process of losing its culture and its collective mind. That it should be Muslim invaders who become the mass insane asylum's wardens, isn't specific, in a sense, to Islam, it would have been some other group if there weren't a world-wide, pernicious religious ideology to step in, because nature, and even the anti-natural, former Western civilization, abhors a vacuum.

[Steely Tom]

I didn’t need that.

[Molon Labbie]

Allow muslim genital mutilation under religious pretexts, then you may as well allow honor killings.

[Lurkinanloomin]

For muslims to freely practice their religion, others must die.

Islam is evil and needs to be extirpated from anyplace that wishes to live in peace.

[so_real]

For a long time I expected the self-inflicted incidents of suicide, disease, depression, violence, and premature death among the homosexual community would dissuade America from slipping into Sodom. It hasn't. I can hope and pray that the beheadings, mutilation, violence, repression, and fascism of islam will dissuade America from slipping into barbarism. But it won't. Having God as our shield is the only way to defend against evil, and half of America has cast that shield aside. It seems a good fight, quick death, and heavenly reward are in the cards for us.

[JimRed]

For muslims to freely practice their religion, others must die.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"... - First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America

The two are incompatible and the only cure is to name Islam what it truly is; a totalitarian socio-political system masquerading as a religion.

[Little Ray]

Aztecs don’t have the “religious freedom” to rip out people’s hearts. Moslems do not have the religious freedom to mutilate their little girls.

End of argument.

Doctors or nurses who do this should lose their licence.
The parents should lose their children.
If the doctor, nurse, OR parents are not citizens, they should be immediately expelled and never allowed into the US again.

[Maverick68]

islam is a Theocracy, not a religion.