Social ‘scientists” can produce any results they want.
The research design was reasonable and objective.
An overwhelming percentage (I forget exactly what--95+%, IIRC) of the subjects were exclusively HETEROsexual. Many of them had active female partnerships that they were actively sexual in. They could have been otherwise as there was no social negatives attached to homosexuality in their cohorts (age groups). However, they did NOT have a homosexual attraction nor any homosexual behavior. So a lot of the macho blather on this thread is just that--uninformed blather to rationalize their (evidently avoidant attachment style, fear-based) hostility to the research findings.