Mussel loader?
Mussel loader? Yup! Those little clams had those assault rifles! The dumbass that wrote this had the brain of a clam!
For shooting clams.
Mussel loader?
Yea it’s muzzle loader!
And laugh if you want, but a freshwater mussel at 1300 FPS would mess you up! And it has to be pretty terrifying for the mussel also.
With a side of clams and linguini
Is this a trick question?
After reading a couple of sentences I don't even know what his point is.
Stop gunsplaining... you are just trying to negate his clams.
Reloads at a snails pace.
The "used by the military" test was applied by SCOTUS in the 1939 Miller case. If a short barrel shotgun was of a type used by the military, not only could the feds not ban it, possession could not even be taxed.
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense. Aymette v. State, 2 Humphreys (Tenn.) 154, 158.Scalia used rank intellectual dishonesty to turn this case on its head when he composed Heller. Under the new test, and unconstitutional restiction becomes constitutional if the courts ignore the issue for long enough. Long standing unconstitution bans become constitutional because they are long standing.
It uses the dreaded 50 cal clam sabot.
The author should clam up and spell better...
Yeah, and “clips” for Roger 10-22s.
Repeatedly, so not a typo.
The founding fathers clearly were not looking at a right to weapons stuck to the walls by one or more byssal threads.
This is one of the reasons the Supreme Court ruled the National Firearms Act of 1934 constitutional:
The Second Amendment protects only the ownership of military-type weapons appropriate for use in an organized militia.
A short barrel shotgun is not a military issue weapon and therefore not protected under the second amendment. Now they want to ban AR style rifles because they are too much like a military issued weapon. Our government in action.
Shellfish—for those times when one runs out of lead ball?