Will be struck down by SCOTUS, assuming they take up any case filed by the executive branch. The problem is, how to stop these district court a$$wipes from issuing decisions that go against black-letter law.
Another Judge on the Soros/Obama payroll and receiving his orders from Obama’s Garage Bunker
Find another judge. Thete’s a good one on Brownsville that shut DACA down before.
No objective judge would dare rule in favor of one executive order over another.
The judge, John Bates, was appointed to the Federal District Court by George W. Bush. Prior to being a judge, Bates worked for Ken Starr’s Office of Independent Counsel on the investigation into the death of Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster. Patrick Knowlton, who was in Fort Marcy Park the day of Foster’s death, and who was a Grand Jury witness regarding the case, makes serious accusations against Bates here http://www.fbicover-up.com/miguel-rodriguez.html In February of 1997, while working for the OIC, Bates sent me a letter denying my federal Freedom of Information Act administrative appeal that immediately preceded my lawsuit. His letter was an exhibit to my complaint. His letter is the last page of this file: http://allanfavish.com/images/PDF/complaint.pdf
Time for another Pelican Brief...
I have been reading various articles on this and thing the problem is with the DOJ sending up incompetent attorneys that likely are trying to lose the case. Read the details and the judge is trying to tell them how to argue the case, which they have not done. The problem is the attorneys, not the judge.
Obama admitted he didn’t have the right to do what he did, but did it anyway. Now a judge is demanding that President Trump break laws again.
This judge needs to be impeached.
Mark
A member of the judicial branch just ordered the executive branch to ignore laws passed by the legislative branch. At what point do these activists judges become a constitutional crisis? I mean if this isn’t the worst offense I’ve ever seen, I can’t think of what is. It’s not the most extreme case of judicial activism but it’s the most extreme and overt act of judicial supremacy that I can think of for sure.
What the judge has said is though other courts have denied one President’s Executive Order is now enforced and expanded by another President.
Talk about a Constitutional Crisis. Jackson once said:”Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it.”
Obama did a ton of things like this just to cause trouble
It is an illegal order. The judge doesn’t obey the law or the basis of the law’s foundation: the constitution. Thus, there is no reason for any other branch of government to adhere to his ruling. Trump should tell him to pound sand.
Ignore it while appealing it, if possible. I’m beginning to think that these judges are ruling as far afield as they can, hoping that congress will impeach him if he fails to obey their clearly unconstitutional rulings. Madness.
There are two possibilities:
1. Obama’s executive order was a legal exercise of Presidential powers. If that is true, Trump’s executive order reversing it is also a legal exercise of Presidential powers.
2. Obama’s executive order was not a legal exercise of Presidential powers. In that case, Trump’s EO reversing it might be illegal. But in that case, DACA is already illegal and has to fall.
Simply refuse. A court has no enforcement capability. That is an EXECUTIVE function.
they should play hail to the chief when he takes the bench