Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Just Tried to Ban 80% Lowers and AR-15 Build Kits
https://www.80-lower.com/blogs/80-lower-blog/new-york-just-tried-to-ban-80-lowers-and-ar-15-build-kits/ ^ | Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Posted on 09/24/2019 6:44:22 AM PDT by Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

New York state Attorney General Latitia James just told 16 different websites and gun makers to stop selling receiver blanks and gun-making kits to residents of New York. James' office put out the letter with some excerpts that are pretty damning for the Second Amendment:

"Your website offers unfinished lower receivers that require simple milling in order to manufacture unregistered and unserialized assault weapons, despite the fact that such manufacture and possession are illegal in New York. Assault weapons are illegal in New York, and the sale and/or advertisement of these products violates New York law. I hereby demand that you stop the sale and advertisement to residents of New York of unfinished lower receivers and firearms components that are intended for the assembly of assault weapons.”

Specifically, the cease-and-desist order targets the 80% lower, an unfinished aluminum or polymer firearm receiver that requires extra work - some cutting and drilling with power tools - to be made functional. These receiver blanks are combined with special build kits that include a prebuilt AR-15 upper receiver, lower parts kit, buffer, handguard, trigger, and everything required to assemble your rifle, pistol, or SBR.

Interestingly, the cease-and-desist order makes some claims that likely rest on shaky legal ground. A.G. James claims that receiver blanks are used to only build assault weapons. In fact, the tone and language of the letter seems to imply that any finished receiver blank should be considered an assault weapon. Yet even a finished 80% lower is simply a stripped lower receiver, a generic firearm with no features. It doesn't have any of the parts described in the letter ("... at least one of several enumerated secondary characteristics, including a pistol grip or a stock that folds, telescopes, or bears a thumbhole") that would allow any state or federal law to define the receiver, the firearm itself, as an assault weapon.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 has long held that building a gun at home without a license is perfectly legal. One doesn't need an FFL, background check, or any paperwork. The ATF has clarified this very practice is legal, even when building an AR-15 using an 80% lower receiver. This cease-and-desist order is likely inspired by federal bill H. R. 7115, which attempts to ban gun-making kits and receiver blanks nationally. On its heels is yet another federal assault weapons ban introduced in February, H. R. 1296. The bill is currently short by seven co-sponsoring Democrats. A heavy legal battle is likely to ensue in New York and in the House, especially as we near election season proper. The situation in New York is breaking and developing. New information will be provided as companies and manufacturers respond to these over-zealous demands.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Hobbies; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: ar15; banglist; guncontrol; newyork; secondamendment

1 posted on 09/24/2019 6:44:22 AM PDT by Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Anything thought up by progressives will not work.
Law of the multiverse.
Dumb*sses build dumb laws.
Which, of course, will NOT be obeyed.


2 posted on 09/24/2019 6:51:10 AM PDT by Da Coyote (eh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Chuckle...

“Latitia James”.... yeah... I’m gonna obey THAT, sure...


3 posted on 09/24/2019 6:51:51 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
The New York AG needs to be charged under the Civil Rights Act.

Nothing less than this will cause these scum to take the 2nd Amendment seriously.

4 posted on 09/24/2019 6:54:02 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Why spend money on a legal battle? What she’s requesting isn’t enforceable anyway...


5 posted on 09/24/2019 6:56:29 AM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

new york lets rapists, murderers and pedophiles
walk free (even sitting on the evidence for YEARS).

so what/who is left to arrest?

those who defend themselves or the Elected President.


6 posted on 09/24/2019 6:59:02 AM PDT by Diogenesis ( WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
18 U.S. Code § 241. Conspiracy against rights U.S. Code Notes prev | next If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7018(a), (b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(a), title XXXII, §§ 320103(a), 320201(a), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(A), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)
7 posted on 09/24/2019 7:00:05 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

A law doing that goes into effect October 1st here in Connecticut. Strangely, with all the unconstitutional gun laws this state has the local news is still filled with shootings every day.


8 posted on 09/24/2019 7:00:43 AM PDT by CtBigPat (Qanon - Please be real...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Too Bad we don’t have a US Attorney’s Office in New York, otherwise he and his buddies would be facing serious prison time for “Conspiracy Against Rights”


9 posted on 09/24/2019 7:01:47 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

“...Nothing less than this will cause these scum to take the 2nd Amendment seriously. ...”

Oh, the Left takes it seriously, all right. That’s EXACTLY WHY they’re trying to ban YOU from having fighting guns that can stop them.

They know damn right well - I’d say even more so than ordinary Joe Working Guy - what the 2nd Amendment is about.


10 posted on 09/24/2019 7:01:54 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

This will stop only when they can kill you for having the knowledge to build a firearm... For the children. (The one’s they don’t murder in the womb)


11 posted on 09/24/2019 7:03:15 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot (I won`t be wronged. I won`t be insulted. I won`t be laid a hand on. - John Bernard Books)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

An 80% receiver is otherwise known as a paperweight. It is a hunk of metal with no particular function. Even the ATF has ruled these to NOT be firearms (though a finished, or 100%, receiver is technically a firearm). The only federal restrictions on self-made 100% receivers are that you cannot make one (or 50) with the intent (at that time) to sell them to others. They suggest that you serial number the receiver, in case your firearm is stolen, so that you can get it back if it is recovered.

People have been making firearms for their own use for literally centuries in this country - so if people continue to do this then they are not doing anything unusual or illegal.


12 posted on 09/24/2019 7:03:48 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Hey Latitty, they’re called semi-automatic rifles, you dumb ass gun grabber!


13 posted on 09/24/2019 7:04:41 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Ban liberals, NOT guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Time to cordon off NY and CA from the rest of us.


14 posted on 09/24/2019 7:06:12 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Just sell them in New Jersey.................


15 posted on 09/24/2019 7:08:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Net effect: When people hear about this, sales of unfinished receivers will skyrocket.


16 posted on 09/24/2019 7:12:50 AM PDT by FXRP (Cogito, ergo Spam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CtBigPat

“Strangely, with all the unconstitutional gun laws this state has the local news is still filled with shootings every day.”

Clearly that shows the need for way more unconstitutional gun-control laws! Plus adjacent states also need the same laws enacted.

You can always tell if there aren’t enough unconstitutional gun-control laws on the books if there are still shootings. /s


17 posted on 09/24/2019 7:17:47 AM PDT by Junk Silver ("It's a little hard to herd people onto trains when they're shooting at you." SirLurkedalot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith

Don’t give ‘em an inch, just need .308” to change their minds.


18 posted on 09/24/2019 10:35:33 AM PDT by S.O.S121.500 (Had ENOUGH Yet ? ........................ Enforce the Bill of Rights .........It is the LAW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

“they’re called semi-automatic rifles, “

No they aren’t. Even a 100% lower isn’t semi automatic. Some people make bolt action uppers.


19 posted on 09/24/2019 2:51:54 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Half a million dollar fine and ten years in prison.
DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW

https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law


20 posted on 09/24/2019 2:53:35 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson