Posted on 11/13/2020 11:35:51 AM PST by george76
According to The New York Times, potentially 90 percent of those who have tested positive for COVID-19 have such insignificant amounts of the virus present in their bodies that such individuals do not need to isolate nor are they candidates for contact tracing. Leading public health experts are now concerned that overtesting is responsible for misdiagnosing a huge number of people with harmless amounts of the virus in their systems.”
“’Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…’ warns The Times.”
Yes, that’s what the NY Times is confessing (8/29) [2]: “Some of the nation’s leading public health experts are raising a new concern in the endless debate over coronavirus testing in the United States: The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus. Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”
“In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”
Let me break this down for you, because it’s a lot worse than the Times admits. The rabbit hole goes much deeper—and I’ve been reporting on the deeper facts for months.
The issue appears to be the ballooning sensitivity of the PCR test. It’s so sensitive that it picks up inconsequential tiny, tiny amounts of virus that couldn’t harm a flea—and it calls these amounts “positive.”
Therefore, millions of people are labeled “positive/infected” who carry so little virus that no harm would come to them or anyone they come in contact with.
That would be bad enough. But the truth is, the PCR test is not able to produce ANY reliable number that reflects how much virus a person is carrying. A lot, a little, it doesn’t matter.
The test has never been validated, in a large-scale study, for the ability to quantify the amount of virus a person is carrying. I’ve proposed how that study should be done IN THE REAL WORLD, NOT IN THE LAB.
You take 1000 people and remove tissue samples from them. A lab puts these samples through its PCR and announces which virus it found in each case and how much virus it found in each case.
It says: “All right, in patients 23, 46, 76, 89, 265 we found a high amount of virus.”
That should mean these particular patients are visibly sick. They will have obvious clinical symptoms. Why? Because actual illness requires millions of millions of a virus replicating in the body.
So now we unblind these particular patients with high amounts of virus, according to the PCR. Are they, in fact, sick? Or are they running marathons and swimming five miles a day? Let’s see. For real.
THIS VALIDATION OF THE PCR HAS NEVER BEEN DONE.
Therefore, the claim that the PCR can determine how much virus is in a human is completely and utterly unproven. Period.
Therefore, ALL the PCR tests being done on people all over the world reflect NOTHING about illness, infection, contagion, or transmission.
The scam is wall to wall.
But there’s more.
The PCR isn’t even testing for a particular virus in the first place. It’s using a piece of RNA assumed to be part of a virus. The assumption is unproven.
And finally, as I’ve been writing and demonstrating for months, there is no evidence that researchers used proper procedure to discover “a new coronavirus that is causing a pandemic.” [3]
Therefore, the PCR test, as worthless as it already is, aims to show the presence of a germ that has never been shown to exist.
But let’s lock down the planet, destroy economies and untold numbers of lives in the process.
Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California is incredulous that this high a threshold has been established for the PCR test:
I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive.
Translation: If it requires 40 cycles to return a positive PCR test, it is a false positive and the patient tested is, in point of fact, negative.
“A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, Morrison added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less.”
Though the average person doesn’t realize it, the significance of lowering the threshold from 40 to something like what Drs. Morrison and Mina suggest is immense:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3900464/posts
More accurate is “Hospitalizations in SOME states are up.” Scroll down to see in Ok they are about 4x May. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/oklahoma-coronavirus-cases.html
Thank you!!
‘this news couldn’t have coem out way before the election?’
this article was written September 1...
This article is from September 1, 2020. Somehow I did not see it back then though I believe it is explaining things about the many false positive PCR tests very accurately.
Is it possible that many of the fearful Biden voters do not know that there is a 99% chance of surviving if you contract coronavirus? Do you watch CNN enough to know that this is the first time they have reported it? If CNN has never reported that the survival rate is so high, it would be a journalistic malpractice on a par with never mentioning the “laptop from hell”. Or Bobulinski.
Elderly people and people with comorbidities, just like everyone else, should be able to make their own decisions about where they go and with whom they come in contact.
It is so disgusting that so many young people across this country are not in school, cannot play sports, and are looking at a screen all day long.
During the pandemic of the flu 1918 and 1919, it was not possible to just end it by deciding how the testing would be performed.
“ Because actual illness requires millions of millions of a virus replicating in the body.”
Dangerous nonsense.
Illness is caused by T cell-mediated immune attack on the lung capillaries. Who gets it and why is poorly understood. A lot of people with COVID pneumonia have low virus titers.
Whoever wrote this doesn’t know jack about the subject.
It was all about killing Trump’s economy from the beginning. Covid and the election - biggest frauds of the century.
If biden and his cult had a modicum of respect for this country and it’s people...this travesty would not have been imagined, much less executed.
God Bless President Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.