Posted on 12/13/2020 7:53:55 AM PST by Starman417
Conservative judicial reticence hurt Texas in its long reach for standing but it will help President Trump if he uses the Article IV guarantee of a republican form of government to order federal takeover of the January 5th runoff elections in Georgia.
Texas has teed it up perfectly. When President Trump brings in the Army to conduct model open and honest elections to select the next two U.S. senators from Georgia he’s going to need a political army behind him and that is what Texas and the 18 states who joined Texas v. Pennsylvania give him.
The left will denounce us as tyrannical and Georgia will immediately sue over the election interference: “No fair forcing us to have honest elections!” But the Supremes should be no more interested in getting involved than they were in the Texas case.
Finding the correct constitutional authority
Texas was unable to overcome the fact that the Constitution gives it to the states to set their own election rules. “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” ruled the Court.
Texas is right that the fraud-enabling states didn’t establish their fraud-enabling election rules the way the Constitution specifies: via legislation, but it is the legislatures of those states that were wronged by being unconstitutionally bypassed and they aren’t suing.
Texas is injured but what hurts Texas is not how PA, GA, WI and MI put fraud-enabling rules in place. It is the fact that they did put fraud-enabling rules in place, and nothing in the parts of the Constitution that Texas sued under says that these other states can’t set up phony elections, no matter how much it hurts the honest states.
Stopping phony elections was left by the founders to a different part of the Constitution: the Article IV guarantee to the states that each of them “shall have a republican form of government.”
Republicanism means “that the people should choose whom they please to govern them” (Alexander Hamilton, cited in my previous discussion of the guarantee clause).
Since phony elections usurp the people’s choice they are a definitively unrepublican form, meaning states can’t have phony elections, and if they do The United States is supposed to go in and change their form of government.
The president can do this on his own authority. He has a constitutional duty to do it, and he does not have to wait for any court okay. He just can’t wait too long to step up to the tee or the opportunity will be missed.
The obvious first guarantee clause action: not letting Georgia use its rigged electoral system to steal not just the presidency but also the Senate. This one should not even be controversial.
Federal takeover of the Georgia run-offs is simple because it doesn’t require invalidating any already-conducted election. That is a big hurdle in itself and having a guarantee clause action that can be taken without having to clear that hurdle offers a clean entry for establishing the presidency’s never before used power to enforce the republican guarantee.
The recent general election provides plenty of evidence of Georgia’s election-stealing unrepublican form. First are Georgia’s huge self-created vulnerabilities to election fraud: Dominion election machinery custom created for communist dictator Hugo Chavez for the express purpose of stealing elections; multiple ballot applications helicopter-dropped to every address in the state with next to no verification required for voting these easy-to-harvest out-of-custody ballots, etcetera. There is also massive evidence of executed election fraud: observers kicked out so that large dumps of nearly all Biden votes could be mass processed with no verification, to mention one.
Only after Georgia sues will the courts come in and take a look at the steps the president is taking and his justification for them. The justifications are super strong. Action is warranted, so the imposed remedy just needs to be thoroughly republican: a model of open and honest elections.
Judicial reticence should do the rest
This time reticence should be on the side of letting the president do what he thinks needs to be done. That is because the Court’s established precedent on the republican guarantee is to say that the questions it raises are properly left to the political branches of government to decide.
Georgia would have to make a strong case to overcome that, convincing the Court that it is being hit with great harms that the Constitution does not allow. What, for having to endure honest elections?
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
POTUS can add his name as a plaintiff on the Texas+21 suit and it can be refiled immediately and
POTUS may need to send federales into Georgia, alas, to prevent another D election theft operation from taking over the US Senate
(the D’s have been openly advertising for out of state people to travel to GA and vote there in this runoff..., such a brazen election theft operation has not been seen since Tammany Hall or Chicago Daley or today’s rigged elections in the once-great state of Californication.. all D... all the time...no matter what). We need honest elections in this country!! We have become no better than Idi Amin, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea
Delusional.
You have a defeatist attitude. All your remarks do is piss people off here that are genuine supporters of Trump and the Constitution. I suspect this is some sort of attention game, which makes you a closet democrat. A loser for sure, for that’s exactly what you express by your comments.
President Trump's WINNING batting average is so high because his philosophy is "NEVER, EVER, EVER GIVE UP. KEEP FIGHTING!".
Ronald Reagan (one Freeper's tag line long ago said it best for me "longs for Reagan") had the same attitude. In the very dark days for conservatives back in 1964, when LBJ was about to wipe out Barry Goldwater in that election, Reagan didn't throw in the towel but gave one of his most EPIC speeches ever, "A Time for Choosing".
I think the "pessimistic loser disease" far too many have comes from being in the minority for so long, that some don't know how to act like winners, when our side is winning or can win. Winners lose, they don't turn into losers.
I remember the same kind of talk during the Obama administration.
Any post to suggest using the army to enforce the election, is beyond ridiculous. Not worth reading a line after that.
_______________________________________
I don’t think US Army should be involved in politics at all...I agree with you...
That's usually how these defeatists roll. They love losing and being publicly humiliated.
I’m bummed out, deep in despair and out on the ledge BUT I am hanging on til the bitter bloody end because the only other option is to step off.
And I’m in no hurry to do so.
Go Trump!
Pray to God!
HOLD!!!!
Reddit took down theDonald subforum. Speaking of that, FR is headquartered in California. Probably a bad move there.
The new Congress convenes January 6. Inauguration Day isn't until January 20. She's not going to deny the D's a vote in that interval.
The last time a sitting Senator was elected VP (LBJ in 1960), he didn't resign his Senate seat until a few minutes before the inauguration.
She doesn't have to.
Gain Newsom can nominate a new US Senator and have them sworn in the moment Harris resigns.
Ok, so the Court's ruling against Texas was: Hey, you sued under the wrong part of the Constitution, dummies! DENIED! Meaning the contested swing-states' hapless Republican state legislatures should have done something, ANYTHING! I'm starting to come around to the Court's opinion: Republican legislatures should have sued before the election. And now, playing Monday-morning quarterback, those states' hapless Republican legislatures should have sued both before AND after the election, to ensure that no Court or Justice could hide behind either the "you're too early" or "you're too late" excuse. But seeing how all these Courts uniformly decide against President Trump, it wouldn't surprise me if the Courts (regardless of whether the suit was filed before or after the election) were to rule, "You should have filed it ON Election Day! DENIED! [Gavel BANG!]"
And it was best thing that ever happened. TheDonald.win is thriving better than ever and free from all the Reddit censorship.
bttt
You are correct on the point that “we” are doing nothing but complaining on this web site.
But, after your president Joe Biden inauguration, you can kiss the complaining goodbye here because they WILL ELIMINATE ALL non conforming web sites.
THIS SITE will cease to exist. As will all of such sites.
Give it a year.
after the unsupreme court failure the other day, there is no longer ANY constitution. So your president Joe Biden needs not to be sworn in. He can simply assume his power and use it to enforce his laws upon you.
Is it constitutionally legal for the fake-news MSM & Big Tech/social media censorship companies to just "Cancel" the entire White House, period? So if you do any kind of web search or even dark-web search, you get back:
No results found for 'White House'.
Results for White House (without quotes):
It looks like there aren't any matches for your search
Tip: Try using words that might appear on the page you're looking for. For example, "lame-duck," "racist!" or "xenophobic!" instead of "White House."
Need help? Check out other tips for searching on Google.
You can also try these searches:
"Sleepy Joe Basement-Biden accumulated 81.3 Million votes!"
"The most secure election in American history!"
"Biden: 'We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.' "
"There's no evidence of election fraud!"
"Go, Marxism-Communism! Go, BLM/Antifa! Go, George Soros!"
Gag Order Failed | Forensic Results of Dominion Machines Stealing Votes LEAKED!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kzPDkFtNfjD1/
Gen Flynn now has the data useful for sending the alternate sets of electors... from at least 4-6 state legislatures ... not
the governors and appointed secretaries of states that may be there tomorrow am. Guess who presides over the selection and tally process in the coming weeks? Pence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.