No judge found that.
###############################
So, what say you, LL?? Are you convinced by the evidence put forth by the examiners of these machines? The findings indicated that an abnormal (100x) number of ballots were sent for “adjudication” and hence all ended up in the Biden tally. Does that not provide enough proof to you that this was no doubt repeated hundreds and thousands of ballot counts around the nation??
His (LL’s)opinion on the matter is irrelevant . What is relevant is that the judge made no judgment other than to allow the publication of the testimony.
Who cares if I'm convinced? The judge matters, and he said he'll hold a trial on these allegations in April of 2021.
All I can say, based on 42 years as a lawyer, is that an expert's initial opinion rarely looks as good after cross-examination.
In the last case I tried before I retired, the plaintiff offered what they called "the nation's foremost valuation expert" who testified on direct examination that a company was worth between $50-$100 million. After he was cross-examined (not by me, by my partner), the judge found the company was worth zero.
My only point is, don't take one side's claim and say it was what a judge found. This Wisconsin judge found hasn't made any findings yet.