A little more than 2 pages, basically saying to the Intelligence Community, your report on foreign election interference is not accurate, and it is also fundamentally dishonest.
Ratcliffe cites 1960-s era precedent. The Intelligence Community assessed that Russia was unlikely to deploy missiles to Cuba. The dissenter at the time was correct, and the Intelligence Community was incorrect.
About a month late
and...Trump was right again. Were Brennan’s buddies suppressing information...again?
“...There were strong efforts to suppress analysis of alternatives (AOA)..which is a violation of Tradecraft Standard 4 and IRTPA Section 1017...(CIA) officials rejected NIC coordination comments and tried to downplay alternative analyses in their own production during the drafting of the NICA...
“...similar actions by Russia and China are assessed and communicated to policymakers differently, leading to the false impression that Russia sought to influence the election but China did not. This is inconsistent with Tradecraft Standard 1.”
I’m sure there are some here more knowledgeable than I. It says Unclassified at the top. So this is NOT a Declas?? Looks like something rewritten off the original report. I would think for it to be official, it would be stamped Classifed - as it was classified at one time and then some sort of declassification stamp and a signature and date. Not a fresh document. Any experts weigh in please.
Well, that was anticlimactic.
The Deep State is mighty deep.