Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Here is the link directly to the PDF:

Views on Intelligence Community Election Security Analysis

1 posted on 01/17/2021 10:38:21 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CivilWarBrewing

A little more than 2 pages, basically saying to the Intelligence Community, your report on foreign election interference is not accurate, and it is also fundamentally dishonest.

Ratcliffe cites 1960-s era precedent. The Intelligence Community assessed that Russia was unlikely to deploy missiles to Cuba. The dissenter at the time was correct, and the Intelligence Community was incorrect.


2 posted on 01/17/2021 10:45:08 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

About a month late


3 posted on 01/17/2021 10:45:38 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing


4 posted on 01/17/2021 10:50:39 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

and...Trump was right again. Were Brennan’s buddies suppressing information...again?

“...There were strong efforts to suppress analysis of alternatives (AOA)..which is a violation of Tradecraft Standard 4 and IRTPA Section 1017...(CIA) officials rejected NIC coordination comments and tried to downplay alternative analyses in their own production during the drafting of the NICA...

“...similar actions by Russia and China are assessed and communicated to policymakers differently, leading to the false impression that Russia sought to influence the election but China did not. This is inconsistent with Tradecraft Standard 1.”


7 posted on 01/17/2021 11:32:50 AM PST by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

I’m sure there are some here more knowledgeable than I. It says Unclassified at the top. So this is NOT a Declas?? Looks like something rewritten off the original report. I would think for it to be official, it would be stamped Classifed - as it was classified at one time and then some sort of declassification stamp and a signature and date. Not a fresh document. Any experts weigh in please.


9 posted on 01/17/2021 11:45:52 AM PST by MomwithHope (Forever grateful to all our patriots, past, present and future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Well, that was anticlimactic.


10 posted on 01/17/2021 11:51:04 AM PST by dinodino ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

The Deep State is mighty deep.


12 posted on 01/17/2021 12:10:29 PM PST by upchuck (The deep state swamp: You gotta be a snake killer or a snake. ~ h/t .44 Special)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson