[NohSpinZone]

This would seem like an open-and-shut case to me in favor of these Christian students (God bless them). But I have no idea in the insane culture climate we’re living in and I don’t trust the SCOTUS to do anything right anymore.

[eyeamok]

The answer is that they face no penalty for doing so

And why is that?? If it was about the Supreme Court Decision on Abortion, all these Campus Officials would be in JAIL

[lurk]

What did the lower and appeals courts decide on this? The practice of the Roberts court is to let stand in cases they approve and throw back for a re-write in cases they disapprove.

This one has the look of instructing the lower court to disallow speech suppression, at least on this campus.

[Democrat = party of treason]

To hell with the current SC, they have all too obviously pointed out their worth. “IF STUPID COULD FLY, THEY’D BE A JET”

[gtwizard]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe everyone is missing the KEY element in this case. This case has not only to do with the "attack and retreat" issue, it directly will set precedent for the "MOOTNESS" doctrine, whether a case is moot or not and can a moot case be dismissed without hearing if someone has skin in the game.

This is vastly important because the Supreme Court has ruled the 2020 Election Fraud cases brought before it most recently are all "MOOT" and therefore dismissed.

I find it hard to believe they will fall for this but I do love a good red herring. Couching a mootness judgment within a college free speech case is clever. I just don't think the Supremes will bite as it would disallow "mootness" as a condition for a court to dismiss a case.

[Kevmo]

SCOTUS won’t do the right thing.