[aMorePerfectUnion]

This of course DOES NOT include conversion to Christianity, which was your original question.

But the question I asked was not a Constitutional question of requirements to serve, but an exercise of my rights to evaluate a candidate.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: But the question I asked was not a Constitutional question of requirements to serve, but an exercise of my rights to evaluate a candidate.

But your personal right to whoever you want to vote for, Christian or otherwise, was never in question. It’s Vivek’s QUALIFICATIONS that should be at issue here, and his being a Christian isn’t. His being a constitutionalist is.