[PGR88]

LOL. Whatever they intended from the “leak,” its having the opposite effect on me.

I respect Tucker Carlson even more

[Governor Dinwiddie]

And the problem is? This one is over my head … I don't see the issue.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The more they attack him, the stronger he gets.

More, please.

[Flatus I. Maximus]

So they’re accusing him of speaking truth?

[Jewbacca]

Tuckers admitting he thought the lawyer was slime and Tucker hated him — and didn’t want to hate him— shows his noble character.

Says a lot about the leaker that the leaker thinks this is bad.

I have no doubt a lawyer for Dominion is scum. I’ve often noticed scummy people have scummy lawyers.

And it makes me think a lot of Tucker for him to realize how he knew hatred — even for a POS like this lawyer — is a bad idea.

[Round Earther]

Tucker certainly put that lawyer who trigged him to shame.

[bigbob]

Fox must he using the same PR firm as Bud Light.

[joshua c]

calling a lawyer a slimy mf’er

can i get an amen?

[chuckee]

Slimy muth****fer lawyers often become slimy muth****fer judges.

[joshua c]

watch Trump in his depositions

cool as a cucumber

[meyer]

Well, he isn’t wrong!

[chajin]

Tucker, unlike the Dominion attorney, is a big [SHUT YO’ MOUTH] but I’m talkin’ about Carlson [THEN WE CAN DIG IT].

And yes, Tucker got the shaft, which is the worst kept secret of FOX News.

[Songcraft]

The people who currently run Fox are also slimy m~~~ers!

[lee martell]

All those ‘leaks’ are doing is keeping Tucker’s profile high.
He’s being kept in the front of our minds, vs being let go and pretty much ignored ever since, the way Dan Bongino is being ignored by that network. They aren’t dropping any stink bombs about Dan.

[KarlInOhio]

Tomorrow’s leak: Tucker sent his wife roses for Valentine’s Day and took her out to dinner.

[TBP]

And correctly so.

[noiseman]

The slimy behavior he describes is pretty much SOP for a deposition. I’ve been through many in my career, and they’re never pleasant, though they get a bit less stressful as you learn what to watch out for. One of my pet peeves is when the opposing attorney asks what seem to be simple questions but which also contain a subtle premise that they are trying to get you to accept. I would always ask them to rephrase the question because I didn’t agree with the included premise, which after you do that a few times gets them frustrated and angry. They word their question in that way sometimes to try to get you to seem to be agreeing to two different things when you think you’re only agreeing to one.

Of course, the cardinal rule in either depositions or trial testimony is to carefully listen to the question and only answer what was asked and no more (unless you’re facing an inept attorney who words their question in such a way that they provide you an opening to get in information that they don’t want - then it’s a ton of fun to watch them panic as you “answer their question” in great detail).

[vpintheak]

Are these “leaks” supposed to make people not like Tucker? Makes him more real and likable is you ask me. I don’t like the language , but the sentiments are correct.

[Songcraft]

Here's a link to a song that Tucker can sing to those evil Mucker Foxers currently running Fox:

      "You're No Good"

[Irenic]

So. It was ‘his truth’. hahaha