Posted on 05/05/2023 8:38:22 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
Jacinda Ardern’s government had an emotional response to the crisis and a mistaken understanding of science, which led to multiple vaccine-induced deaths. Have these victims become a new source of organ donors for organ transplantation?
By perusing scientific literature from around the world, New Zealand’s Dr. Guy Hatchard explores what vaccine-induced deaths mean from the perspective of transplant surgeons.
“[While] transplant surgeons are very excited to have more available young donors … [they] completely fail to comment on the significance of the increased number of cases of vaccine-induced death,” he writes. “Transplant surgeons are narrowly focused on their discipline. Despite being aware of increases in covid vaccine-induced death, they wrote papers which failed to sound the alarm.”
This leads Dr. Hatchard into a discussion of the harms vaccines cause and the efforts of Ardern and MP (Midazolam Pusher) Matt Hancock to ensure information about those harms are never publicly discussed or investigated.
(snip)
A pre-pandemic 2016 paper found that victims of fatal strokes are generally robust sources for organ transplant donation, especially if they are younger in age. The one exception was the need for caution with livers transplanted from those dying as a result of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) whose recipients suffered poorer survival outcomes.
THIS paper published in April 2023, describes a single case of a person who suffered a stroke in October 2021 caused by covid vaccination whose organs were harvested for transplant. The paper notes in passing that:
Thrombosis combined with thrombocytopenia generally occurs in the first month following vaccination and can lead to fatal outcomes, even in young, previously healthy individuals. These young adults ultimately may become solid organ donors.
(Excerpt) Read more at expose-news.com ...
If these vaccines are unhealthy, why would you want the organs?
Was this part of an underlying campaign to boost organ transplants. More organs more medical procedures.
An excellent question.
Along with a few about why the vaxshills insist folks take these.
If the vaccines are so good - why do gov’ts need to continually “persuade” folks to take them?
Shouldn’t the people be lining up for them the world over?
They work right?
Folks are vibrant and immune after administration of this serum right?
The stupid around here has become breathtaking.
Jacinda Ardern should be on trial for Nuremberg 2.
There was talk that the hospitals during the height of the scamdemic were selling the organs of the patients they killed with their wicked gov’t treatment protocols, i.e., ventilators, remdesivir, etc. The hospital got a government stipend/bonus for using the prescribed CDC protocols and then sold their patients’ organs out the back door.
A lot of people will line up for free anything, including free vaccines. Well, that is their right.
I believe the US government pays $1000 for each shot. They really aren’t free, though they appear so. Obviously, there would be far fewer people wanting a shot if they had to pay for the benefit received.
By the way, the old definition of vaccine was that it prevented you from getting the illness. The CDC, who some people quote as authoritative, redefined vaccine for the Wuhan virus mRNA shots.
Every day it’s “You think that was somethin’? Hold muh beer and watch this!”
I have to admit it’s cheap entertainment.
Aren’t blood thinners used as standard of care in transplant patients?
I don’t want an MRNA kidney.
That being said, I’ve been on dialysis - young. The years I should have been in college, I was attached to that machine, and I don’t want to do it again. If I had no other options, I’d take it.
Amen to that statement. Of course our classically conditioned posters of all things incorrect fail not the statement “a single case”. This whole article is based on a single case that is tenuous at best.
What a joke they have become. More lies. More scare tactics from them. More irrelevance for them.
You really are that dense. Hospitals selling organs. “There was talk”. Yeah. Among kooks.
Thanks I needed the good laugh. It is comical the stunning ignorance that people, as in this case you, promulgate.
Fools always move the goalposts and redefine narratives and meanings of words.
That’s why the people pushing the suicide shots are a special kind of sociopath.
If there is money to be made…
I don’t think this is happening.
I think this is why illegal children are being trafficked across the southern border. And explains why tens of thousands of these kids can’t be accounted for. They’re commodities for the new depraved healthcare industrial complex.
“I don’t want an MRNA kidney.”
There is no such animal.
But your own DNA has been generating mRNA all of your life, every time that it builds a protein. So you’re stuck having mRNA in all of your cells.
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/translation-dna-to-mrna-to-protein-393/
You really are that dense. Hospitals selling organs.
_________________________________
You know, I wear your ridicule as a badge of courage. Your ignorant criticism is right up there with the CIA’s psychological shaming operation to declare anyone who doesn’t swallow their lies a ‘conspiracy theorist.’ I’m way too old to take such bullcrap seriously. I will continue to tell my version of the truth the best way I know how. Why don’t you do some research rather than spout invectives? This time I will help you find the truth on this subject. First, listen to another ‘kook’ (sarc} Tom Renz and his client Adrienne Smith explain how doctors and hospitals ‘hasten death.’ Ask yourself, now why on earth would they do that?
https://tomrenz.com/another-renz-rant-best-of-renz-replay-hospital-whistleblower-the-killing-floor-episode-63/
Then understand the extent of the organ ‘donation’ market.
Do you have any idea what is the value of your human body parts?
Thank you for your response. You have provided data that demonstrates your lack of knowledge and fundamental dishonesty in your statements. Whether it is sophistry or intentional deceit … either way you declare yourself with the statement “I will tell my version of the truth”. Obviously you are aligned with liberal ideology that truth is absolute. In science and conservative thought we seek to discern THE truth which is absolute, not to tell our version of the truth which is nothing more than an opinion. This line of thinking you embrace is how we have the whole transsexual nonsense. The truth is by analogy a person is a man. His truth is that he is a woman. He then insists on his truth being accepted as true. This leads to the tyranny of opinion as the definition of truth is now relative and it also slides is on the slippery slope of complete loss of morality. You have revealed yourself.
So let’s turn to your sources of which I have read all three. In the post I responded to of yours, you state “and [hospitals] sold the patients’ organs out the back door”. This is where I pointed out you were wrong. You instead tell me I am using CIA tactics and present three articles to support but true to moral relativistics, these articles have zero to do with your untruthful statement.
Article #1 is a vlog post by an attorney with a financial interest in suing from a personal injury standpoint. He is a slip and fall lawyer. He uses as his source a clinical pharmacist who simply repeats what the attorney wants to be said. The pharmacist has neither the credentials nor the bedside experience to evaluate the CDC killing protocols as they are called. The source itself is called Renz-rant. He is widely discredited as a shill for antivaxx fame and fortune seekers and gives an opinion platform (oh I am sorry his version of the truth) with no substantial supporting evidence except what is quintuple hearsay. This is. Or a source and has nothing to do with “hospitals selling organs”. In fact you ask use this as a false base with no foundation of hospitals hastening death (another bald face lie) to ask the question “why would they do this”. You see there is zero statement as to organ donation in this so called piece of evidence but rather you attempting to set up an opinion. This is called latches and never passes any standard in either court or science.
Article #2 is an OPINION piece in USA Today May 2019. In this case the writer discusses death by transplant and sites theoretical ethics concerns emerging in CANADA and WESTERN Europe. Again this has zero to do with transplant procedures in America, then or now. But it is a clever feint to try to get the gullible in your echo chamber to believe that organs are harvested from living donors for the sole purpose of harvest. Another bold face lie.
Article #3 is your most absurd evidence. In this blog post from an unverified writers forum called medium, the writer who has no knowledge of anything clinical attempts to value the human body (interestingly he stares the whole body with working organs is worth 45 million to an institution). He also says you can sell your appendix for $25. This is such utter bullshit that words fail the stupidity of this article. But here you are in your truth attempting to connect that hospitals are making these monies out the back door. Your original statement is fact which is entirely incorrect
So let me educate you and hopefully the truth will set you free. In America, harvest of organs are only complete in two circumstances: 1. Confirmed asystole > 3 minutes by an independent physician from the transplant team and a pronouncement of death. 2. Brain death criterion is met by absence of flow on four vessel transcranial Doppler testing (no blood flow to brain) or brain death criteria are met by standard clinical exam including positive apnea test and other neurological examinations that are technical but incredibly specific. This also must be administered by a physician independent of the transplant team
I have provided to you the protocols of transplant in America. There are no payments from a market sources where hospitals are selling out the back door live patients or profiting from an organ harvest.
I have no idea what you mean to accomplish by telling so many lies. By revealing your dishonesty or your ignorance. I do know that you proclaim your truth which is demonstrably not factual. I have analyzed your so called evidence and there is no question you are intentionally deceiving. And it is all hidden in threads that loudly profess the Faith. It seems we yet have again stumbled into the study of the Pharisees and Sadducees. Thank you for providing evidence of whom you really are.
Peace.
No. it’s been that way for a while now
It gets quite tedious. Empty calories for the mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.