Posted on 07/22/2023 2:15:40 PM PDT by thegagline
Back in March, The Heritage Foundation requested documents from the DOJ using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding the government’s investigation of Hunter Biden. Unsurprisingly, the DOJ refused.
Then, on June 20th, after several years of government investigations, Hunter Biden was charged with multiple, watered-down offenses.
The charges were so weak they created a presumption of corruption at the DOJ. ***
Six days later, the Heritage Foundation filed a FOIA lawsuit in Washington, D.C. (good luck getting a fair shake there) and requested the court force the DOJ to disclose critical records about the Hunter Biden investigation which would demonstrate that the Biden Administration and corrupt Attorney General Merrick Garland were obstructing the prosecution. Heritage argued that the judge in Hunter’s criminal case needed to see the records so that the sham prosecution would be exposed, and Hunter would not get a lenient judgment due to third-world level rank corruption.
Predictably, the far left federal judge, Dabney Friedrich denied Heritage’s request. The judge explained that DOJ couldn’t be asked to turn over the records because it was too busy responding to records requests about the January 6th riot. ***
The same day this honorable judge Friedrich denied Heritage’s request, IRS investigator whistleblowers testified:
They were blocked from searching Hunter Biden’s home; They were prevented from speaking with Biden’s family members; That the DOJ refused to impose felony tax charges – even though the investigators (who were Democrats, by the way) strongly recommended them; That the US Attorney leading the investigation had personally told them – contrary to his public statements – that Biden and Garland had obstructed his ability to conduct his investigation AND curtailed his ability to bring the charges he wanted to bring.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Guess who nominated this “far left judge”? Hint: the nomination was announced on June 7, 2017.
Ad hominem attacks and excuses to follow:
I don’t think she’s far Left. She’s overwhelmingly establishment though. Tough on Jan. 6th prisoners.
Are you constipated?
Do you feel like you are holding back fifty pounds of groceries?
Then we have the answer for you!
Try the new Davis Doody Drill!
In just seconds, the Davis Drill can help clear a path to your relief!
It’s only $19.95!
Be sure to get yours today.
“I got doody!”
THAT'S not gonna last long. 
I just realized about the "scales of justice".
Rarely, almost never do I advocate for anything regarding CW2 or anything “aggressive”. But this judge proves that anything Roberts says is BS and a rope and tall tree limb is 100% warranted.
.
In an Impeachment Inquiry, the Republicans in the House have plenary Subpoena Power.
Impeachment Inquiry is the answer, but McCarthy has promises to keep.
.
Correct.
On November 16, 2017, the United States Senate invoked cloture on her nomination [to the US District Court for the District of Stooges] by a 93–4 vote. On November 27, 2017, her nomination was confirmed by a 97–3 vote.
Gillibrand, Warren and Sanders voted Nay.
DEFINITELY a McConnell judge.
The US Constitution would like a word with you. Federal Judges are appointed by the President and not a Senator. In the case of this “far left” judge, she was nominated on June 7, 2017 by the President.
Here is the official White House announcement: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-candidate-nominations/
We need the senate back. Yes some senators aren’t perfectly pure. But they sure would not have Biden getting over 120 judges confirmed already. God knows how many more before January 2025.
jmo, but DC courts should not have any jurisdiction over US citizens
Especially if they’re allowing not citizens to vote & become part of the jury pool
I never said she was far-left.
The author of the article, Jim Hoft, said that.
As for the difference between a McConnell judge and a Trump judge, I'm a little more qualified than you are to pass judgment on that nuance.
I've been doing the Article III thing on FR for many many years.
You got here like, what - yesterday? FR born-on date 2017-11-11.
Interesting that your screen name wasn't around for the bitterly-fought FR primary wars of 2016.
I always have a suspicion about "new" NeverTrumpers who joined up after the righteous purge of spring 2016.
ESPECIALLY the militant, industrious ones...
The Left already took back the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Is there not ONE HONEST DEMOCRAT JUDGE? NOT ONE??
Well that certainly qualifies you to practice law in the Federal Courts. As for Article III, if you comprehended it, you'd know that the President makes the federal judicial appointments. I even provided the White House link to Trump's official announcement nominating Dabney Friedrich. You got here like, what - yesterday? FR born-on date 2017-11-11.
Actually, I've been on FR since the late 90s under different names. I was mostly a lurker as I was busy…you know…being a practicing attorney…and running my law firm.
You may now go back to being the self-professed elder Article III statesman.
You're an admitted retread, and NeverTrumper.
BTW - if you're an ACTUAL attorney, then you know the Rules of The Game in the federal courts - and you're lying to deceive our readers, just like most any attorney would do.
You know how the judicial appointment schemes work.
Pretending that "Trump is PERSONALLY responsible" for these appointments is just another attorney lie - the mother's milk which most of you scum are baptized in.
Thanks for fessing up!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.