Posted on 10/01/2023 3:40:44 PM PDT by Enterprise
The study included 303 nonvaccinated patients (mean age, 52.9 years; 157 females) and 700 vaccinated patients (mean age, 56.8 years; 344 females). Vaccinated patients had overall higher myocardial FDG uptake compared to nonvaccinated patients (median SUVmax, 4.8 vs median SUVmax, 3.3 ; P < .0001). Myocardial SUVmax was higher in vaccinated patients regardless of sex (median range, 4.7-4.9 ) or patient age (median range, 4.7-5.6) compared to corresponding nonvaccinated groups (sex median range, 3.2-3.9; age median range, 3.3-3.3; P range, <.001-.015). Furthermore, increased myocardial FDG uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120, and 121-180 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 4.6-5.1) and increased ipsilateral axillary uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120 days after their 2nd vaccination (median SUVmax range, 1.5-2.0) compared to the nonvaccinated patients (P range, <.001-<.001).
This was not supposed to happen! The COVID vaccine is not supposed to affect the heart in any way. It was promised to “stay in the arm.”
The explosive findings of the study are discussed in the editorial that the editor of the magazine, Dr. Bluemke, felt obliged to publish.
(Excerpt) Read more at igor-chudov.com ...
No wonder they push so many boosters on the survivors
$cience.
Dead men tell no tales.
the covid cell “therapy” infiltrates all healthy cells throughout the body.
the infiltrated cells produce poison.
the immune system kills the compromised cells to the best of it’s ability.
some organs have cells that can regenerate, some don’t
draw your own conclusions
My conclusion is that something monstrous has happened and the people responsible will never be punished.
Does this include the J&J non-mRNA version?
Imagine that. Shocked I tell ya!!!
“the people responsible will never be punished.”
that all depends on who is running the simulation
So now the verdict is unnanamous, they are clearly trying to kill us.
Yes, it was equally lethal.
Oh, so you post a March 2021 WSJ article in order to insinuate, what, exactly?, that this most recent study is "Russian disinformation"?
What a goddamned pathetic little shill you are. "Pathetic," in the sense that your handlers aren't even getting their money's worth at this point from your ham-handed touch. Keep up the good work, chump.
with all the money big pharma is sending you, that’s the best you’ve got? Russia, Russia, Russia.
adam schiff is that you?
There is actual real science, and there is “science fiction”, which does not necessarily refer to the literary genre.
All kinds of hypotheses can be dressed up with language that APPEARS to be based in some kind of research, but an intensive study of that “research” has been revealing that charlatans and rogues have been huckstering sham conclusions and intentional omissions of fact from the conduct of those studies, if in fact any actual study was made at all.
I think a lot of what passes for “research” is just a bunch of geeks in white lab coats making up crap.
They knew this, all along.
his hearts not in it any more, like it used to be before the heart damage.
absolutely by design!
so was it the graphene that causes the damage?
Current status: No shots, no problems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.