Well, this person defended Stalin (and even got a Pulitzer for it), so Bidenomics is likely not much of a stretch for the NYT people.
Posted on 01/03/2024 10:10:21 AM PST by JV3MRC
The New York Times employed two of their Bidenomics-shilling flunkies to harp on why the president’s decrepit economy is actually great and to treat disgruntled voters as if they're just dumb for not buying it.
Times columnists Paul Krugman and Peter Coy co-authored a conversational-like piece of propaganda to once again attempt to prop up the Bidenomics cadaver. “Paul, I think the economy is going to be a huge problem for President Biden in 2024,” Coy wrote. He then condescended to voters: “Voters are unhappy about the state of the economy, even though, by most measures, it’s doing great.” Krugman, who already made himself look foolish Dec. 16 by claiming 2023 was “one of the best years ever” for the U.S. economy, echoed Coy’s nonsense: “I’m not sure about the politics. We can get into that later. But first, can we acknowledge just how good the current state of the economy is?” To which Coy gleefully responded, “Absolutely.” Their bumbling conversation piece was headlined: "Will the Economy Help or Hurt Biden ’24? Krugman and Coy Dig Into Data."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
I wonder how much the Dung Beetle Party paid for the national “media”, all the shyster lawyers and Feral “judges”, “experts, fart checkers and “analists.
There is a mental illness epidemic in this country, and at least part of the cause is the widespread expectation that people must believe things which they know are not true. It messes with your brain.
I’ve seen some “OMG! Biden is so awesome!!!” type ads on youtube.
Too bad nobody but wealthy liberals even read the Slimes. Everyone else is too busy making ends meet.
“I’ve seen some “OMG! Biden is so awesome!!!” type ads on youtube.”
I am sure that it would be possible to dig up videos of some stars from the 70s praising Carter..
Would be amusing to run these back to back.
Well, this person defended Stalin (and even got a Pulitzer for it), so Bidenomics is likely not much of a stretch for the NYT people.
Fortunately clowns like Krugman only have one vote, and those he might influence with his propaganda are already voting for the Demons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.