Freep this poll for the White House

Newsweek ^ | 02/09/2004

[Jinjelsnaps]

Well darn, they get a high voter turnout and then they complain about it...

It's not so much that, as it is the high voter turnout didn't turn out the way they wanted it to...web users can't think bush is doing a good job and want him re-elected! Can't be!

[Desron13]

They have killed the poll page since they were getting massacred here on FR. however, this link still displays the poll results, or at least it did a few minutes ago.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4205947

[soycd]

Typical left-wing media bias. The DUmmies DU the poll much more than FR. Let's tell MSNBC all about it...

[fight_truth_decay]

Well darn, they get a high voter turnout and then they complain about it.

Twas not the results Newsweek was hoping for. They are correct in one regard: We Are Special and We Are Interested !!

Regards,
fight_truth_decay

[TaxRelief]

Pretty cool the way they are steering people to FreeRepublic.

[Jota]

Even in The Guardian talkboards there's a thread about you...


http://tinyurl.com/3dufv

[TaxRelief]

Welcome to FreeRepublic Jota! We are the number one website dedicated to the preservation of a Free Republic!

We pop up in the Guardian talkboards regularly and are referred to regularly. There are many liberals who would like to see FR disappear. Why? Because they can't stop us or control us the way they manipulate the media and the government. That's it in a nutshell.

Are you a Brit?

[Jota]

Thanks for welcoming me, but although I'm sometimes called "FReeper" -which seems to be a term of abuse by some "Lefties", I don't see myself posting here. Although in The Guardian I am considered a Rightwinger (I am an anti-Castro Cuban exile who supports Israel -perhaps more than I oppose Castro-) I am an ex-communist who is certainly on the Left.

There's this myth in The Guardian fora re: censorship to any leftwing POV in this forum... Is that true? I don't really know anything about FR, I just came here out of curiousity but I wonder if you guys are more like a club than a debating space. In any case, you can't be worst than DU...

I'm back to The Guardian. See you there?

[TaxRelief]

Not a myth. If you post in linkable facts, eschew namecalling, and focus on verifiable, unemotional logic, then you will not be banned.

For example:

If you post: "President Bush sucks." That would be inciteful and you would be straight out the door.

If you said: "President Bush should have vetoed the campaign finance reform act because..." and then justified your opinion, you would still be able to stick around. (Unless of course you start pushing communism.)

In other words, stupid, opinion-only-posting, name-calling trolls get thrown out almost as soon as they take their first FRee breath. We simply do not have time to argue with opinionated, brainwashed, ideaological twits who are puppets of the socialist movement.

Have you read anything by Whittaker Chambers, Frank S. Meyer, or James Burnham? (Good conservative minds who are also excommunists.) They are actually responsible for a good deal of the launch of the conservative movement in the 50's and 60's.

[TaxRelief]

It's nearly impossible for a conservative to stay on the Guardian talk boards for more than a couple posts. They ban faster than you can say "Jack Rabbit".

[BunnySlippers]

Hi Mom. :-D

[mrsmith]

MSNBC where the spin comes first!
Who is stupid enough to watch MSNBC?

[TaxRelief]

Everytime I've lost my signin it has been after I've pointed out that homosexuality is not something people are born with.

[TaxRelief]

Gotham, You can avoid the American attacks if you pretend your English. You can get free yahoo.co.uk accounts easily.