Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
"AFAIK, there isn't any supporting evidence anywhere for it. "

There is ash and pumice in Egypt tied to Thera and dated 1628BC+- and a tsunami on Crete dated to 1645BC+-.

Sometimes the ice layers are compressed, melt together or completly missing. I think they are a very good indicator but not 'fool-proof.' We'll have more data within the next five years or so...

32 posted on 06/07/2005 9:21:15 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: blam
"There is ash and pumice in Egypt tied to Thera and dated 1628BC+- and a tsunami on Crete dated to 1645BC+-."
There are deposits believed to be from Thera. The 1628 BC date is based on the ice core evidence, and that doesn't exist any longer. Depending on the depth (and remember, these deposits are not found in contexts by which they can be dated through ruins), they could be from 200 BC, or they could be from 22,000 BC.

There was never a tsunami on Crete in historical times. There's no geological trace of it. The very towns -- contemporary with the supposed supereruption -- which face Santorini show no signs of being overwhelmed by a tsunami. Some of them were burned, but that's consistent with sacking by human hordes. That's a situation to be expected, since inland towns in Crete and on the Greek mainland show the same signs.
33 posted on 06/07/2005 10:52:32 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (FR profiled updated Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson