Skip to comments.
Rivals spur men to produce better sperm
New Scientist ^
| June 8th, 2005
| Racel Novack
Posted on 06/09/2005 7:42:58 AM PDT by missyme
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
06/09/2005 7:42:58 AM PDT
by
missyme
To: missyme
Caaaaaacckkkkk! Who funds these studies....no wait....I don't want to know. I think this is a way to further the gay agenda.
2
posted on
06/09/2005 7:45:01 AM PDT
by
Millee
(So you're a feminist......isn't that cute??)
To: missyme
3
posted on
06/09/2005 7:45:18 AM PDT
by
tahotdog
To: missyme
"Men who view pornographic images of two men and a woman produce better-quality sperm than men viewing pornographic images of just women, an Australian study reveals."
Sounds like an agenda driven study to me.
4
posted on
06/09/2005 7:46:44 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Anyone who thinks we believe Hillary on any issue is truly a moron.)
To: missyme
5
posted on
06/09/2005 7:47:43 AM PDT
by
ken21
(if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
To: tahotdog
Come on how could looking at porn and jerking off be junk science? Surely Galileo and Newton used the same methods.
To: missyme
As long as they keep that sperm in the testing facility we are all safe.
7
posted on
06/09/2005 7:52:46 AM PDT
by
carolinacrazy
(What?!...That could never happen in a.... world.)
To: missyme
There is nothing more precious than watching a threesome porn just before conceiving your first child. Special.
8
posted on
06/09/2005 7:54:43 AM PDT
by
carolinacrazy
(What?!...That could never happen in a.... world.)
To: tahotdog
9
posted on
06/09/2005 7:55:16 AM PDT
by
carolinacrazy
(What?!...That could never happen in a.... world.)
To: tahotdog
10
posted on
06/09/2005 7:55:30 AM PDT
by
carolinacrazy
(What?!...That could never happen in a.... world.)
To: missyme
I am happily married which explains why under a microscope my sperm are in beach chairs sipping beers.
we are also childless
To: missyme
Sorry, but such studies will not persuade me to eschew my sapphic smut. Especially the smut with the whips and chains and the...
Er, I said to much, didn't I? BTW, how do they determine the quality of the sperm? I hope it's not a taste test!
12
posted on
06/09/2005 8:00:03 AM PDT
by
JAWs
To: missyme
I'm not so sure they can assume that the sperm gathered in these "experiments" is normal at all.
I mean, what sort of "normal" man would be willing to watch porno, beat off, and hand over the result while it's still hot? They may entice some men off the street with a monetary reward, but what sort of guys are we talking about here?
13
posted on
06/09/2005 8:01:24 AM PDT
by
zygoat
To: zygoat
Barfing my breakfast over here.
14
posted on
06/09/2005 8:10:52 AM PDT
by
RushCrush
(Never give in! Never, never, never, never! Never yield in any way great or small.)
To: missyme
Typicaly when pornographic images of two men and a woman rearly does the "product" end up in the womans reproductive track.
15
posted on
06/09/2005 8:21:11 AM PDT
by
Moleman
To: Moleman
rearly Was that a Freudian typo? <G>
16
posted on
06/09/2005 8:24:28 AM PDT
by
JAWs
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: missyme
....
asked 52 heterosexual men....I'm certainly glad the writer pointed that out. 
18
posted on
06/09/2005 8:52:05 AM PDT
by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
To: missyme
I don't believe a word of this.
Geesh!
19
posted on
06/09/2005 8:54:28 AM PDT
by
Skooz
To: missyme
And I paid for this garbage "research." Dammit I'm ticked off.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson